Direct bonding to porcelain.

V L Barbosa; M A Almeida; O Chevitarese; O Keith

doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70131-1

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7847273

Direct bonding to porcelain.

V L Barbosa·M A Almeida·O Chevitarese·O Keith

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Orthodontic brackets were bonded to 180 faces of 45 porcelain cubes that were divided into three groups according to their surface preparation. In group I, the glaze had been removed with a sandpaper disk, whereas in group II, it was maintained. A solution of acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel was applied to the samples in groups I and II for 5 minutes after pumicing. In group III, the glaze had been removed with a coarse diamond bur. Each group was further divided into four subgroups, depending on whether a priming agent had been used, and the type of composite used to bond the brackets. Shear force was used to debond the brackets, and the results showed that the APF solution was unable to provide enough retention on porcelain surface to bond brackets. Mechanical retention, obtained with a coarse diamond bur, was necessary to increase bond strength, which can be further improved by chemical bonding, with a silane priming agent. Therefore bonding to porcelain is clinically possible and is an acceptable procedure in orthodontic treatment.

Explore related subjects

Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate Composite Resins Dental Bonding Dental Cements Dental Debonding Dental Polishing Dental Porcelain Dentin-Bonding Agents Materials Testing Orthodontic Brackets Resin Cements Silanes Silicates Surface Properties Tensile Strength Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

V L Barbosa, M A Almeida, O Chevitarese, O Keith. 1995. Direct bonding to porcelain.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70131-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Combined effects of carbon dioxide laser and fluoride on demineralized primary enamel: an in vitro study.

This in vitro study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a CO(2) laser (10.6 microm) alone or combined with acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) on the inhibition of lesion progression in primary enamel. The specimens were treated with/without CO(2) laser and/or APF and submitted to pH cycling. Microhardness analysis was performed and the enamel mineral loss values were obtained. The groups treated with laser and/or APF presented lower mineral loss when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Laser irradiation alone or combined with APF decreased lesion progression in primary enamel. However, the combined treatment did not show any significant additional effect.

Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride↗

PubMed2006

Variation in surface topography of different NiTi orthodontic archwires in various commercial fluoride-containing environments.

OBJECTIVES: The surface topography can affect the friction behavior between an orthodontic wire and brackets during clinical applications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a fluoride-containing environment on the surface topography variations of different nickel-titanium (NiTi) orthodontic archwires. METHODS: Four different NiTi commercial orthodontic archwires were immersed in fluoride mouthwashes and in artificial saliva with the addition of commercial fluoride toothpastes or prophylactic gels for a 28-day period. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to measure the three-dimensional surface topography of NiTi archwires before and after the immersion tests. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the surface roughness variance (including DeltaR(a), DeltaR(ms), and DeltaR(z)) with the archwire manufacturer and immersion test environment as the factors. RESULTS: Both the archwire manufacturer and immersion environment had a significant influence on DeltaR(a), DeltaR(ms), and DeltaR(z) (manufacturer: P<0.05; environment: P<0.0001). Regardless of the archwire manufacturer, no statistically significant difference in DeltaR(a) (<70 nm), DeltaR(ms) (<90 nm), and DeltaR(z) (<450 nm) was observed on the tested NiTi archwires in lower fluoride-containing (<2500 ppm) environments, including the various fluoride mouthwashes and the artificial saliva added with fluoride toothpastes. In artificial saliva added with high fluoride prophylactic gel (around 17,000 ppm), a significant increase in DeltaR(a) (around 120-250 nm), DeltaR(ms) (around 140-320 nm), and DeltaR(z) (around 770-1410 nm), i.e. increasing the surface roughness, was observed on the tested NiTi archwires. SIGNIFICANCE: The variation in the surface topography of the NiTi orthodontic archwires in the commercial fluoride-containing environments should be taken into consideration when the friction between the archwire and bracket is a clinical concern.

Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we investigated and compared the levels of frictional resistance between metal brackets and orthodontic wires after immersion in an acidified phosphate fluoride (APF) agent. METHODS: Three types of mandibular incisor stainless steel metal brackets with beta-titanium alloy wire (TMA), heat-activated nickel-titanium wire (Ni-Ti), and 2 sizes of stainless steel wires (SSW) were immersed in 0.2% APF and pH 6.75 artificial saliva solutions for 24 hours. The study included 480 bracket-wire specimens. The frictional resistance was measured on an EZ-test machine (Shimadazu, Tokyo, Japan) with a 5-N load cell. An Alastik (Quik-Stik Clear, A-1 Alastik, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) module ligated to the bracket was attached to the crosshead of the machine and pulled at a speed of 10 mm per minute for a distance of 5 mm. A completely randomized 1-way ANOVA was used to test for significant differences among the 3 bracket/wire specimens after immersion in 0.2% APF and pH 6.75 artificial saliva solutions. This was followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison of means ranking at P <.05 to determine differences between the groups. RESULTS: In the APF-immersed group, the static frictional force was greater than the kinetic frictional force. The frictional forces of the orthodontic wires had statistically significant differences (P <.05) in this progressive order: TMA, Ni-Ti, and SSW. Similar frictional force results were obtained in the pH 6.75 saliva group (P <.05). The frictional force values of the APF group were higher than those of the pH 6.75 saliva group (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the frictional forces of orthodontic brackets and wires are influenced by contact with fluoride-containing solutions.

Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride↗