PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7852436

Transfer function between tibial acceleration and ground reaction force.

M A Lafortune·M J Lake·E Hennig
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to capture the relationship between ground reaction force (GRF) and tibial axial acceleration. Tibia acceleration and GRF were simultaneously recorded from five subjects during running. The acceleration of the bone was measured with a transducer mounted onto an intracortical pin. The signals were analyzed in the frequency domain to characterize the relationship between GRF and tibial acceleration. The results confirmed that for each subject this relationship could be represented by a frequency transfer function. The existence of a more general relationship for all five subjects was also confirmed by the results. The transfer functions provided information about transient shock transmissibility for the entire impact phase of running.

Explore related subjects

AccelerationAdultEnergy TransferFourier AnalysisGravitationHumansRunningSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedStress, MechanicalTibiaTransducersWeight-BearingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Lafortune, M J Lake, E Hennig. 1995. Transfer function between tibial acceleration and ground reaction force.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)80014-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Comparison of chin and jaw movements during gum chewing.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Knowledge of mastication is based on studies that use jaw tracking equipment in nonroutine settings. Ethologists would argue that such data probably does not reflect routine masticatory function. If jaw movements could be tracked noninvasively, then the hypothesis that jaw tracking equipment and nonroutine settings alter mastication could be investigated. PURPOSE: This study quantitatively evaluated the relationship between chin and jaw movements during a gum-chewing task. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Masticatory chin and jaw movements of 50 subjects were tracked in the x-, y-, and z-axes for 15 seconds, which resulted in approximately 15 chewing cycles obtained per subject. For each chewing cycle, magnitude and timing of displacement, velocity, and acceleration extrema in each axis were computed for both jaw and chin movement data. Extrema means were calculated for each 15-second trial. The respective means representing chin versus jaw movements were compared with linear regression and correlation analyses. RESULTS: All mean extrema were significantly correlated (r range 0. 30-0.99; P <.05). Magnitude correlations were larger than timing correlations for acceleration extrema. In contrast, magnitude correlations were smaller than timing correlations for displacement extrema. The highest correlation occurred for chewing rate. CONCLUSIONS: Chin and jaw movements were correlated during chewing; however, only chewing rate was highly predictable from chin movement data.

Acceleration↗
PubMed1999

Oculomotor control of primary eye position discriminates between translation and tilt.

We have previously shown that fast phase axis orientation and primary eye position in rhesus monkeys are dynamically controlled by otolith signals during head rotations that involve a reorientation of the head relative to gravity. Because of the inherent ambiguity associated with primary otolith afferent coding of linear accelerations during head translation and tilts, a similar organization might also underlie the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during translation. The ability of the oculomotor system to correctly distinguish translational accelerations from gravity in the dynamic control of primary eye position has been investigated here by comparing the eye movements elicited by sinusoidal lateral and fore-aft oscillations (0.5 Hz +/- 40 cm, equivalent to +/- 0.4 g) with those during yaw rotations (180 degrees/s) about a vertically tilted axis (23.6 degrees). We found a significant modulation of primary eye position as a function of linear acceleration (gravity) during rotation but not during lateral and fore-aft translation. This modulation was enhanced during the initial phase of rotation when there was concomitant semicircular canal input. These findings suggest that control of primary eye position and fast phase axis orientation in the VOR are based on central vestibular mechanisms that discriminate between gravity and translational head acceleration.

Acceleration↗
PubMed1998

Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man.

Vertical arm pointing movements in two directions (upwards and downwards), imposing two different loads (unload and 0.5 kg) and speeds (normal and fast) have been studied in six subjects. Movements were recorded using an optoelectronic system. Data analysis concentrated upon finger-tip kinematics. Significant effects of movement direction were recorded upon velocity profiles. The acceleration time, computed relative to total movement time, was greater for downward movements than for upward movements. In contrast however, no effects of load or speed were observed. Movement time was not affected by movement direction or load, for both speeds tested. These results suggest different planning processes, for movements with and against gravity and indicate that gravitational force influences the processes controlling movement execution.

Acceleration↗