PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7937467

Environment-immune interactions.

R R Dietert·K A Golemboski·R E Austic
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The need for effective immune function for the maintenance of health has been clearly established in both agriculturally significant animal species and humans. Intensive agricultural practices present production species with numerous disease challenges during the rearing period. Environmental factors represent a ubiquitous, yet frequently manageable, category of immunomodulators that can influence immune performance and ultimately disease susceptibility or resistance. However, strategies for assessing overall immune potential have not been widely implemented for agricultural species. This is in contrast to the use of immune evaluation for human health considerations. Immune assessment relative to environmental-immune interactions can produce benefits in two areas. First, the efficiency of the production operation can be enhanced. Second, the welfare of the animals during the production cycle can be optimized. This paper presents an overview of environmental factors known to influence the immune function of poultry and the opportunities to manage environmental factors to benefit the health of the animals. In addition, the paper discusses the status of immunological assessment for humans and laboratory animals and proposes potential immune assessment panels that could serve as a tool to optimize the environmental management of poultry populations.

Explore related subjects

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietEnvironmentHumansImmune ToleranceInfectionsModels, TheoreticalPoultryPoultry DiseasesStress, PhysiologicalTemperatureUnited StatesJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R R Dietert, K A Golemboski, R E Austic. 1994. Environment-immune interactions.. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731062

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Natural scrapie and PrP genotype: case-control studies in British sheep.

Natural scrapie in sheep is associated with polymorphisms of the PrP gene, particularly at amino acid codons 136, 154 and 171. This paper reports the results of nine scrapie case-control studies in Bleu du Maine, Herdwick, Merino x Shetland, Poll Dorset, Scottish Halfbred, Shetland, Soay, Suffolk and Swaledale sheep from British flocks affected by scrapie. In some outbreaks, scrapie was found to occur only in animals with at least one PrP allele encoding valine at codon 136 (V136), usually a relatively rare allele in healthy controls. In other outbreaks, the V136, PrP allele was either not found or was not an absolute prerequisite for scrapie to develop. Although scrapie had a strong tendency to affect sheep with PrP genotypes homozygous for glutamine at codon 171 (QQ171), these genotypes (QQ171 but varying at other codon positions) were relatively common in healthy controls. The reliable prediction of scrapie susceptibility in previously uninvestigated sheep flocks will therefore require information at least about PrP genotypes at codons 136 and 171.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed1997

Sense or nonsense? Traditional methods of animal parasitic disease control.

In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in traditional health-care practices in the western as well as in the developing world. In animal health, this has led to further interest in ethnoveterinary research and development, a relatively new field of study that covers traditional practices, ethnobotany and application of animal care practices embedded in local tradition. This development has practical applications for animal parasite control, whether related to epidemiology, diagnostics and therapy, or to comprehensive disease control methods leading to integrated pest/disease management. Examples are provided of traditional practices in diagnostics, herd-, grazing- and pasture-management as well as of manipulation and treatment. Many of these applications indicate a basic understanding of disease, especially epidemiology, by farmers and herders, although not always explained, or explainable, in rational western ways. Although abuse and quackery exist, the application of traditional practices seems to make sense in areas without adequate veterinary services. Moreover, acknowledgement of the value of traditional knowledge empowers local herders/farmers to try to solve their herds' disease problems in a cost-effective way. Traditional practices often make sense, albeit with some regulation to ascertain safety and to prevent abuse.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed1997

Nematode control practices and anthelmintic resistance on British sheep farms.

Nearly 23 per cent of 3000 randomly selected sheep farmers returned questionnaires on strategies to control the development of anthelmintic resistance. Twenty-five per cent stated that they regularly checked the accuracy of their drenching gun, and 52 per cent stated that they weighed a few animals and treated the whole flock like the heaviest. The mean annual frequency of dosing lambs was 4.39 compared with 2.43 for ewes. Forty-eight per cent stated that they changed the anthelmintic group annually. Seventeen per cent always treated sheep brought on to their farm with ivermectin. However, only 7 per cent had had their flocks tested for anthelmintic-resistant nematodes. The responses suggest that most sheep farmers are not actively seeking to prevent the development and spread of anthelmintic-resistant nematodes.

Animal Husbandry↗