PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7941671

[Exercise tests in spirometry].

Abstract

Actual situation: There is a great variety of exercise programs (formerly called protocols) used in daily routine and general practice. Exercise programs vary with increments, step-duration, speed and grade, although standard recommendations have been published recently. In the USA, the Bruce program is widely accepted, although some criticism has been published. Comparing different exercise programs it is obvious, that maximal values (VO2, heart rate etc.) are only moderately affected by the program, but submaximal values are strongly influenced by the methodological procedure. Advantages and disadvantages of the different exercise testing procedures will be presented. As we need some standardized exercise programs to avoid "free-style ergometry", recommendations may be based on the following assumptions: Exercise testing should not be too short nor too long (10-12 min total test time), work rate increments should be intermediate (adapted to physical fitness), work rate steps should be about 2 min or an individualized ramp test should be used. Exercise test programs have to be selected according to the patient's fitness, to the disease or function to be studied, and to the laboratory setting. Standardization is strongly recommended.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Löllgen, P Dirschedl, U Fahrenkrog. 1994. [Exercise tests in spirometry].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7941671/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of exercise training on myocardial remodeling in patients with reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction: application of magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting reports on the effects of training on the remodeling process in post-myocardial infarction patients with ventricular damage. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with reduced ventricular function (mean ejection fraction, 32.3+/-6%) after an anteroseptal or inferolateral myocardial infarction were randomized to an exercise group (n=12) or a control group (n=13). Patients in the exercise group resided in a rehabilitation center for 2 months and underwent a training program consisting of two 1-hour sessions of walking daily, along with four monitored 45-minute sessions of stationary cycling weekly. Before and after the study period, maximal exercise testing and cardiac MRI were performed. Oxygen uptake increased 26% at maximal exercise (19.7+/-3 to 23.9+/-5, P<.05) and 39% at the lactate threshold (P<.01) in the exercise group, whereas control values did not change. No differences were observed within or between groups in MRI measures of end-diastolic (187+/-47 pre versus 196+/-35 mL post in the exercise group and 179+/-52 pre versus 180+/-51 mL post in the control group), end-systolic volume (118+/-41 pre versus 121+/-33 mL post in the exercise group and 119+/-54 pre versus 116+/-56 mL post in the control group), or ejection fraction (38.0+/-9 pre versus 38.2+/-10% post in the exercise group and 37.0+/-10 pre versus 38.3+/-13% post in the control group). Myocardial wall thickness measurements at end diastole and end systole and their difference in 80 myocardial segments determined by MRI yielded no significant interactions between groups. When myocardial wall thickness measurements were classified by infarct or noninfarct areas, no differences were observed between groups over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A high-intensity, 2-month residential cardiac rehabilitation program resulted in substantial increases in exercise capacity among patients with reduced left ventricular function. In contrast to some recent reports, the training program had no deleterious effects on left ventricular volume, function, or wall thickness regardless of infarct area.

Exercise Test