PubMed · 7951620
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M A Limouzin-Lamothe. 1993. [Why, when, how to evaluate bone density?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7951620/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
There is still controversy over the impact of diabetes control and duration on bone mass and growth parameters in children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The aim of this study was to assess bone mineral density (BMD) at axial and appendicular sites, in children with noncomplicated IDDM of recent onset, and its relation to metabolic control and auxological parameters (weight, height, and puberal stage). Fifty-five young Spanish IDDM, otherwise healthy patients (26 males, aged (SD 9.7 +/- 4.3 years) and 29 females, aged (SD 11.2 +/- 3.8 years) were studied. Duration of diabetes was 1-13.8 years. Two hundred eighty-two age-matched, healthy, Spanish children served as controls. HbA1 was assayed by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and BMD was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) densitometry at the spine and forearm. Results showed a Gaussian BMD distribution of patients according to sex and age, without sexual-stage differences. There was no correlation between BMD and glycated hemoglobin (average life disease or last HbA1 values) or duration of the disease; moreover, no differences in bone mass were found between <3 and >/=3 years of disease duration. Diabetes impact index (mean HbA1 x duration of disease in months) showed no significant influence of diabetes control on BMD. We could not demonstrate any impact of diabetes on BMD and growth parameters in children with IDDM of short duration.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy has been carried out on the copper K edge in oxidized and reduced bovine Cu,Zn SOD in solution and in crystalline state. The results indicate that the copper coordination geometry is unaffected by the solution or by the crystalline state of the protein, in both oxidation states. Moreover the two oxidation states of the active copper ion are reflected under, all the experimental conditions, by distinct coordination spheres around the catalytic metal, which is four-coordinated and three-coordinated in the Cu(II) and in the Cu(I) enzyme, respectively.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional regional bone mineral density of the pedicle was measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Biomechanical tests were performed to clarify the role of the pedicle in screw stability. OBJECTIVES: To identify the structural characteristics of the pedicle that supports pedicle screw stability and the differences in these characteristics between normal and osteoporotic vertebrae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The pedicle screw is an essential component of many systems used to align the spine. The contribution of the pedicle to screw stability, however, has not been fully investigated. METHODS: Trabecular, subcortical, and cortical bone mineral density and the area of the pedicle were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone mineral density also was recalculated in four circumferential layers. These parameters were compared between normal and osteoporotic individuals. The relative contribution of the pedicle to screw stability was evaluated by caudocephalad and pull-out loading in a vertebra with or without its body. RESULTS: Inner trabecular, middle subcortical, and outer cortical bone mineral density and cortical bone area in the pedicle were significantly lower in osteoporotic vertebrae than those in normal vertebrae. In the pedicle, bone mineral density increased close to the outer layer. Bone mineral density not as thick even in the outer layer in osteoporotic subjects. Approximately 80% of the caudocephalad stiffness and 60% of the pullout strength of the pedicle screw depended on the pedicle rather than on the vertebral body. CONCLUSION: Screw stability depends on the structural characteristics of the pedicle. The pedicle was denser in the subcortical bone, in which the threads of the screw engage, than in trabecular bone. In osteoporosis, bone mineral density was not as dense even in the outer layer, and the cortex was thinner than normal. A larger screw would not enhance screw stability and may break the thin cortex in osteoporotic vertebrae.