PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7958585

Systemic thinking: how do we know it when we see it?

Abstract

One discussion within the field of family-oriented care concerns the distinction between those who practise a family approach and those who think in family system terms. This paper presents a comprehensive model of systemic thinking that may be useful for both family systems teachers and researchers. The conceptual model includes: (i) clinicians' experiences with and attitudes towards family aspects of health problems, and the context of clinicians' judgements about these problems; (ii) the way clinicians organize their knowledge about family factors and health problems in order for that knowledge to be readily available for decision making; and (iii) the interview sequences and hypothesis-generating or testing strategies used by clinicians in encounters with patients. The extent to which clinicians exhibit systemic thinking can be determined through interviews, questionnaires and case materials such as encounter transcripts. A method that assesses systemic thinking allows rigorous evaluations of family-oriented teaching efforts and clinical interventions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Rogers, L M Walsh. 1994. Systemic thinking: how do we know it when we see it?. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra%2F11.2.187

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Changes in emotional behavior produced by long-term amygdala kindling in rats.

The effects of long-term amygdala kindling on emotional behavior were investigated. In Experiment 1, rats received 99 basolateral amygdala, central amygdala, or sham stimulations. The rats in both kindled groups displayed more resistance to capture from an open field and more open-arm activity on an elevated plus maze than did the sham control rats. In Experiment 2, rats received either 20, 60, or 100 amygdala stimulations or sham stimulations. Compared to the sham controls, the kindled rats explored less during the first 30s in a novel open field, avoided the central area of the open field, resisted being captured from the open field, and engaged in more open-arm activity on the elevated plus maze. The magnitude of these effects was greatest in the 100-stim rats and least in the 20-stim rats. Together, these results suggest that long-term amygdala kindling in rats is a useful model for studying the emotionality associated with temporal lobe epilepsy.

Affective Symptoms

Indicators of feminine gender identity in latency-aged boys in the Draw a Person and the Rorschach tests.

Seven diagnostic indicators were examined for their potential to identify latency aged boys who had feminine gender identity. Nineteen emotionally disturbed boys (average age 10.2) with feminine gender identity were compared on these indicators with 21 control boys. The indicators which were found to be valid were drawing the female figure with a greater value than the male figure in the DAP; difficulty in identification with the male figure in stories to the DAP; a low relative rate of male human responses and/or a high relative rate of female human responses in the Rorschach; and initial butterfly response to card V in the Rorschach. Using these indicators in combination reduced the false positive and negative rates associated with each individual indicator.

Affective Symptoms

Alexithymia in Holocaust survivors with and without PTSD.

Alexithymia was measured in non-treatment seeking, community-dwelling Holocaust survivors using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-Twenty Item Version (TAS-20). Scores of survivors with (n = 30) and without (n = 26) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were compared, and associations among alexithymia, severity of trauma, and severity of PTSD symptoms were determined. Survivors with PTSD had significantly higher scores on the TAS-20 compared to survivors without PTSD. TAS-20 scores were significantly associated with severity of PTSD symptoms, but not with severity of trauma. This study adds to our knowledge of the relationship between alexithymia and trauma by demonstrating that this characteristic is related to the presence of posttraumatic symptoms and not simply exposure to trauma.

Affective Symptoms