PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7980662

Development and evaluation of a location-specific wire code.

Abstract

The development of a wire code protocol based on a study of electrical installations in Melbourne, Australia, is described. Because of very significant differences between the Melbourne power distribution system and that used in Denver, Colorado, an approach different from that used by Wertheimer and Leeper was required. A combined practical and theoretical approach was used to determine a continuous exposure index, defined as a measure of the potential for exposure due to external electrical installations. The protocol was tested on a convenient sample of 41 homes in which the field was monitored over a 12 hour overnight period. A correlation of 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.92, P < .0001) was obtained between the measured time-weighted average and the wire coding exposure index. To assess the efficacy of the wiring configuration index, a computer simulation of a case-control study was then performed. It was concluded that, using the same basic reasoning of the Wertheimer and Leeper code, it is possible to develop a location-specific code that provides a good correlation with the residential time-weighted average and an acceptable degree of exposure misclassification.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Borghesi, V Delpizzo. 1994. Development and evaluation of a location-specific wire code.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250150408

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Promoting medical student involvement in primary care research.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As the growth of primary care continues, the need for strengthening the scientific foundations of practice becomes more pressing. Although there is general agreement on the importance of promoting primary care research by medical students, little has been reported on how this can be accomplished. The goal of the program described is to involve medical students in primary care research. METHODS: Over the last 7 years, the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Colorado has promoted the involvement of medical students in primary care research through a program consisting of five elements: 1) a student development program (the Family Medicine Scholars Program), 2) financial support for student research, 3) a core of faculty mentors, 4) a strong coordinating effort by the predoctoral education office, and 5) research agendas geared to student schedules. RESULTS: The number of students involved in primary care research, presentations, and publication of papers by students has increased since we initiated our medical student research program 7 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: The elements discussed have proven successful at increasing student participation in primary care research.

Colorado