PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8031702

Therapeutic coverage: reducing the risks of partial compliance.

Abstract

It is now apparent that the incidence of inadequate compliance is greater than had previously been recognised. The pattern of poor compliance is generally characterised by underdosing rather than overdosing and will usually involve interruptions in therapy of several days. There are many potentially important consequences of this, but therapeutically the most important is associated with the period without drug action. Establishing, for a range of antihypertensive agents, that there is a clear relationship between the circulating drug concentration and blood pressure-lowering effect it is possible to demonstrate that the pharmacodynamic characteristics of a drug will be well correlated with its pharmacokinetics. Thus, compared with other agents, amlodipine with its relatively smooth concentration-time profile and long elimination half-life will be superior in maintaining blood pressure control both with perfect compliance and when dosage regimens are perturbed due to missed drug doses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A Meredith, H L Elliott. 1994. Therapeutic coverage: reducing the risks of partial compliance.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8031702/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: a conceptual introduction.

The goal of this paper is to describe the role that control engineering principles can play in developing and improving the efficacy of adaptive, time-varying interventions. It is demonstrated that adaptive interventions constitute a form of feedback control system in the context of behavioral health. Consequently, drawing from ideas in control engineering has the potential to significantly inform the analysis, design, and implementation of adaptive interventions, leading to improved adherence, better management of limited resources, a reduction of negative effects, and overall more effective interventions. This article illustrates how to express an adaptive intervention in control engineering terms, and how to use this framework in a computer simulation to investigate the anticipated impact of intervention design choices on efficacy. The potential benefits of operationalizing decision rules based on control engineering principles are particularly significant for adaptive interventions that involve multiple components or address co-morbidities, situations that pose significant challenges to conventional clinical practice.

Drug Administration Schedule↗