PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8086617

A two-sample test for stochastic ordering with interval-censored data.

Abstract

A new class of asymptotically nonparametric two-sample approximate tests for discrete interval-censored data is proposed. This class extends the family developed by Pepe and Fleming (1989, Biometrics 45, 497-507) for right-censored data and is based on an integrated weighted difference in survival function estimates. The tests are sensitive to the alternative of stochastic ordering and use Turnbull's (1976, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 38, 290-295) estimator of the survival function. The choice of appropriate weight functions is investigated. Simulation results indicate that for interval-censored data the new procedure, with an appropriate weight function, can be more powerful than an omnibus likelihood ratio test and Mantel's (1967, Biometrics, 23, 65-78) test under a broad range of stochastically ordered alternatives. For small sample sizes (n = 50), with moderate censoring (47% and 70%), the size of the test is close to the nominal size.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G R Petroni, R A Wolfe. 1994. A two-sample test for stochastic ordering with interval-censored data.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8086617/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Influence of experimental errors on the determination of flux control coefficients from transient metabolite concentrations.

The influence of experimental errors on the determination of flux control coefficients from transient metabolite concentrations with the method proposed by Delgado and Liao [(1992) Biochem. J. 282, 919-927] has been investigated by using Monte Carlo simulations. The method requires least-squares fitting of the transient metabolite concentrations. Three different fitting methods have been evaluated. Simulated metabolite concentrations of a fictive metabolic pathway were scattered randomly, emulating experimental errors, before performing the fits. This was repeated a large number of times; the mean values and standard deviations of the resulting control coefficients are reported. The results show that the proposed method for determining control coefficients is too sensitive to experimental errors to be practicable, with theoretically justified fitting methods. This is in particular due to the high degree of correlation between the concentrations. An alternative ad hoc fitting method produced biased mean values of the estimates of the control coefficients, but with remarkably low standard deviations.

Biometry