PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8147741

[Objective auditory evaluation by evoked potentials].

Abstract

We have analyzed 1300 Auditory Brain-Stem Response Audiometry exams. The patients were distributed according to criteria related to age, clinical presentation, hearing impairment risk-factors and hearing thresholds. The results were divided into five groups of hearing thresholds: normal hearing (threshold response obtained up to 25 dBHL); mild hearing loss (25-50 dBHL); moderate hearing loss (50-70 dBHL); severe hearing loss (70-90 dBHL); and without response to acoustic stimuli. We have studied the risk-factors related to gestation, delivery and neonatal period, family history of hearing loss, hearing apparatus malformations, craniofacial anomalies, certain modalities of infectious diseases, hearing impairment associated syndromes, and the use of some kind of drugs. Cerebral palsy, neuropsychomotor development retardation and cases without known antecedents were also studied. The main results of our study show: 82.8% incidence of hearing impairment; the late performance of examinations to evidence a definite hearing loss as 54.1% of the examined patients were at ages ranging from one to three years old; 54.0% of total cases have not presented any language development; the risk-factor "Congenital Rubeola" has the expressive incidence of 14.8% and the distribution of this value into hearing threshold ranges has shown an exponential increase which demonstrates a close correlation between that disease and hearing impairment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R R Seixas, M I Fasolo, R N Moreira. 1993. [Objective auditory evaluation by evoked potentials].. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x1993000400002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Auditory air and bone conduction brainstem responses and damped rotation test for young children with bilateral congenital atresia of the ears.

This paper describes our assessment of auditory and vestibular functions at a very early age using the auditory air and bone conduction brainstem responses and the damped rotation test for infants and children with bilateral congenital atresia of the ear. Twelve infants and children with congenital microtia and occlusion of bilateral auditory canals were evaluated by this assessment to determine their function of hearing and balance and their suitability for fitting and surgical improvement.

Audiometry, Evoked Response

Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: simple, beneficial, and presently justified.

In a recent article, Bess and Paradise (Pediatrics 93 (1994) 330-334) rejected the recommendation of the National Institutes of Health that all infants be screened for hearing loss on being released from their birthing hospital. This article responds to their objections with data from the literature and operational newborn hearing screening programs. These data show that universal newborn hearing screening is practicable, effective, cost-efficient, and safe, and concludes that such programs should be implemented without further delay.

Audiometry, Evoked Response

Dilemmas in auditory assessment of developmentally retarded children using behavioural observation audiometry and brain stem evoked response audiometry.

The records of 94 consecutive developmentally retarded children with speech retardation and suspected hearing loss who underwent auditory assessment by both conventional behavioural observation audiometry (BOA) and brain stem evoked response audiometry (BERA) were analysed. In 54 children (57.4 per cent) there was good agreement between the results of both techniques leading to a clearcut diagnosis. In 22 children a diagnosis was possible only by the results of BERA as the results of BOA were inconclusive. Of the remaining 18 children, two groups could be identified whose results posed a dilemma. Group 1 (n = 7) consisted of children whose BOA test results differed considerably from their BERA results. Group 2 (n = 11) consisted of children in whom there was no discernible response by BERA while the response by BOA was either inconsistent (n = 5) or not elicitable (n = 6). The specific strategies to be adopted for hearing assessment in these situations are discussed.

Audiometry, Evoked Response