PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8160097

[How do patients experience radiotherapy?].

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the course of a radiotherapy treatment oncological patients--in addition to some physical symptoms--often experience severe psychological distress. This study assesses and analyses the psychological strains emerging throughout a radio-oncological treatment. Specific intervention measures are being suggested to alleviate patient's psychosocial distress. This study is part of a psychosocial intervention project performed in a radio-oncological department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a semi-standardised interviewing technique 30 radio-oncological in-patients were questioned in depth about their psychosocial situation. Subsequently a fully standardised written questionnaire was designed, enabling a further 150 patients to be investigated retrospectively, when presenting themselves for routine radio-oncological follow-up examinations. RESULTS: In particular, the irradiation session itself, the waiting time beforehand, and the relationship to fellow patients were found to be potentially stressful. More than half of all patients reported anxiety during their first irradiation, which usually decreased during subsequent sessions, and in no case increased. One third of the 30 inpatients wished to have more contact and conversations with fellow-patients, e.g. while waiting for their treatment. The 150 retrospectively assessed patients stated a substantially lower wish for further contact. Almost one third of the in-patients apparently gained comfort from a downward comparison to patients who they perceived as being worse off than themselves. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial intervention can help radiotherapy patients to cope with fears and distress, and thus enhance their quality of life. Support should be provided by psychological specialists, as well as by clinical staff in various ways. Anxiety concerning radiotherapy can often be alleviated through a sensitive and empathetic manner while explaining the radiotherapy process. Patient groups and seminars offer patients the opportunity to exchange experiences and to gain further information about their disease and treatment. In situations of extreme distress psychologists can accompany patients, and if necessary perform crisis intervention. Psychological specialists can also provide further education and support for the clinical staff.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Lamszus, R Verres, K H Hübener. 1994. [How do patients experience radiotherapy?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8160097/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Event-related potential evidence for the processing efficiency theory.

The purpose of this study was to examine the central tenets of the processing efficiency theory using psychophysiological measures of attention and effort. Twenty-eight participants were divided equally into either a high or low trait anxiety group. They were then required to perform a simulated driving task while responding to one of four target light-emitting diodes. Cortical activity and dual task performance were recorded under two conditions -- baseline and competition -- with cognitive anxiety being elevated in the competitive session by an instructional set. Although driving speed was similar across sessions, a reduction in P3 amplitude to cue onset in the light detection task occurred for both groups during the competitive session, suggesting a reduction in processing efficiency as participants became more state anxious. Our findings provide more comprehensive and mechanistic evidence for processing efficiency theory, and confirm that increases in cognitive anxiety can result in a reduction of processing efficiency with little change in performance effectiveness.

Anxiety↗

Brief report: testing the factorial invariance of the CBCL Somatic Complaints scale as a measure of internalizing symptoms for children with and without chronic illness.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factorial invariance of the Somatic Complaints subscale of the Child Behavior Checklist as a measure of Internalizing Behavior Problems across a sample of children with and without spina bifida. METHODS: Multisample confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare mother and father report on the Somatic Complaints subscale across a sample of children with spina bifida and a matched comparison sample of able-bodied children ages 8 through 11 years (N = 68 for mother report in each group; N = 54 for father report in the spina bifida group and 53 for the able-bodied group). RESULTS: Although there were no significant between-group differences in the magnitude of factor loadings, significantly more variance in scores on the Somatic Complaints scale was unrelated to Internalizing Behavior Problems for the spina bifida group, compared to the able-bodied group. There were no between-group differences when father data were analyzed, but the latent variable of Internalizing Behavior Problems explained little variance in the Somatic Complaints scale for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal report of Somatic Complaints on the CBCL does not appear to measure Internalizing Behavior Problems in the same manner across groups of children with and without spina bifida. This suggests that the Somatic Complaints subscale should be interpreted with caution when measuring Internalizing Behavior Problems within this population.

Anxiety↗