PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8167637

[Is absorptiometry useful?].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Ribot, J M Pouillès, F Trémollières. 1993. [Is absorptiometry useful?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8167637/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Aging in women--the four-compartment model of body composition.

The four-compartment model of body composition was examined in 155 white women through measurement of total body carbon (TBC), nitrogen (TBN), calcium (TBCa), and water levels. The age (mean +/- SD) of the population was 51.4 +/- 13.5 years, and values for the four compartments were as follows (in kilograms): protein 8.9 +/- 1.0, water 30.9 +/- 3.5, mineral 2.6 +/- 0.4, and fat 22.6 +/- 7.3. There was a linear change with age for protein and water, whereas mineral and fat were curvilinear. These latter two compartments also showed differences in premenopausal and postmenopausal rates of change. Various models were fit to the data to adjust for body size and age. Each of the four compartments (mineral, water, fat, and protein) changed with age, with fat increasing and the other compartments declining. The equation, y = age + age2 + height + weight, fit the data as well as the other models. Equations are provided to assess body composition in populations with disorders of nutrition, as well as other illnesses, using height, weight, and age as covariates. Since this was a cross-sectional study, longitudinal studies will have to be performed to confirm the accuracy of rates of change with age predicted with each compartment.

Absorptiometry, Photon

Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body-composition assessment in piglets and term human neonates.

The reproducibility, accuracy, and precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was assessed by scanning 13 piglets (1471-5507 g) in triplicate. In four piglets, fat content was increased with porcine lard around the abdomen; additional measurements were performed on these animals. Reproducibility in DXA measurements from the animals without added fat was 0.09% for body weight, 1.95% for bone mineral content (BMC), and 5.35% for fat content. DXA estimates of body weight, BMC, and fat content were significantly correlated with scale body weight, ash weight, chemical calcium, and chemical fat. Body weight was measured accurately but fat content was overestimated by DXA. Mean BMC estimated by DXA represented 48% of ash weight and 215% of calcium content. The precision of DXA was 0.23% for body weight, 10.99% for ash weight, and 4.44% for calcium content. The precision of DXA for fat content was poor. However, for measurements performed in piglets with > 250 g fat, the precision was 8.85%. Thirty appropriate-forgestational-age term human neonates (birth weight: 3188 +/- 217 g) were scanned once during the first week of life. BMC and fat content were 54 +/- 6 and 470 +/- 92 g, respectively, which corresponded to 26.4 +/- 2.6 g calcium and 427 +/- 82 g fat. These were close to the reference values previously determined by chemical analysis. This study suggests that DXA is accurate and reliable for measurement of calcium and fat contents in human neonates. Further refinements would be beneficial for determining fat content in preterm human infants.

Absorptiometry, Photon

Body fat distribution and non-insulin-dependent diabetes: comparison of a fiber-rich, high-carbohydrate, low-fat (23%) diet and a 35% fat diet high in monounsaturated fat.

The effects of a fiber-rich, high-carbohydrate, low-fat (HCLF) diet and a modified-fat (MF) diet high in monounsaturated fat on body fat distribution were examined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 16 subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) during a randomized crossover study. Subjects lost similar amounts of body fat consuming the HCLF and MF diets (-0.83 +/- 0.37 and -0.87 +/- 0.40 kg, respectively) despite a marked difference in total fat consumption. With the MF diet, the ratio of upper- to lower-body fat (UF:LF) remained unchanged because fat was lost proportionately from the upper and lower body. In contrast, with the HCLF diet, a disproportionate loss of lower-body fat caused the UF:LF to increase. The effects of diet on regional body fat loss were significant (P < 0.05, two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA).

Absorptiometry, Photon