PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8193250

Corpus luteal insufficiency.

Abstract

The corpus luteum is controlled by luteinizing hormone (LH) and intraovarian morphofunctional specialization and autocrine/paracrine mechanisms. Corpus luteal insufficiency produces luteal phase defects (LPD). The poor precision and validation of endometrial histologic dating and single or random multiple serum progesterone measurements produce widely variable diagnoses. The true prevalence rate of LPD may be only 3-5% similar to that due to chance. The role of LPD in causing infertility can be challenged because the diagnosis is not predictive of recurrence in subsequent cycles, and other causes of infertility are not controlled for. Intraobserver and interobserver variability, uterine site of biopsy, luteal phase length, time of ovulation, and luteal phase timing of biopsy have been examined and have confirmed the imprecision of dating as a sensitive and reliable assessment of luteal insufficiency. There is support for either early or late luteal phase biopsy. Endometrial dating using LH timing as a reference point is relatively more reliable. Integrated luteal progesterone is the only currently accurate assessment of luteal sufficiency. Clomiphene does not increase LPD but increases serum progesterone, integrated progesterone, corpus luteum LH/human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors, all of which promote increased progesterone production and do not affect endometrial estrogen and progesterone receptors. hCG is more likely to stimulate progesterone production if given at the mid rather than early luteal phase corresponding to the phase with highest total and available (unoccupied) corpus luteal LH receptors. Careful analysis of published studies on treatment of LPD revealed only one randomized controlled study, and, statistically, all studies revealed no better outcome with progesterone treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Y Dawood. 1994. Corpus luteal insufficiency.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8193250/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗