PubMed · 8207456
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J F Martin. 1994. Fuzzy control in anesthesia.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02886818
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
One reason for the reported conflicting results of the effect of ketamine on hemodynamics and respiration may be variations in afferent inputs from peripheral receptors to the central nervous system. In order to evaluate unmasked direct effects of ketamine on sympathetic nerve and phrenic nerve outflow, totally deafferented (involving vagus, sinus nerve, aortic depressor nerve) rabbits (n = 18), rabbits with vagotomy (n = 21), and neuraxis-intact rabbits (n = 6) were used in this study. The animals were anesthetized with urethane and mechanically ventilated. Ketamine 0.5, 1, or 2 mg/kg was injected intravenously and mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and integrated renal sympathetic nerve and phrenic nerve activity (IRSNA, IPNA) were recorded before, and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 min after injection. MAP and IRSNA were significantly decreased, even by the smallest dose of ketamine, in the totally deafferented group. IPNA was decreased by the largest dose of ketamine only in the totally deafferented group. On the other hand, spontaneous respiratory frequency was decreased in the totally deafferented and vagotomy groups, but more so in the totally deafferented group. In the neuraxis-intact group, the only significant change with the largest dose of ketamine, 2 mg/kg was a slight increase in HR. We conclude that ketamine can suppress vasomotor and respiratory centers directly, and that the suppression is counterbalanced by afferent inputs from peripheral receptors.
The measurement of average alveolar expired PCO2 (PAECO2) weights each PCO2 value on the alveolar plateau of the CO2 expirogram by the simultaneous change in exhaled volume. PAECO2 can be determined from a modified analysis of the Fowler anatomic dead space (VDANAT). In contrast, end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) only measures PCO2 in the last small volume of exhalate. In conditions such as mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), where the alveolar plateau can have a significant positive slope, we questioned how much PETCO2 could overestimate PAECO2. Accordingly, in six anesthetized ventilated dogs, we digitally measured and processed tidal PCO2 and flow to determine VDANAT. We determined PETCO2 and PAECO before and after the application of 7.6 cm H2O PEEP. Alveolar dead space to tidal volume fraction (VD/VT) was determined by [arterial PCO2- alveolar PCO2]/arterial PCO2, where alveolar PCO2 was determined by either PETCO2 or PAECO2. During baseline ventilation, PETCO2 was 3.4 mm Hg (approximately 11%) greater than PAECO2. Because PEEP significantly increased the slope of the alveolar plateau from 28 to 74 mm Hg/L, the difference between PETCO2 and PAECO2 significantly increased to 6.6 mm Hg (approximately 20% difference). The concurrent increase in VDANAT during PEEP decreased alveolar tidal volume and tended to limit the overestimation of PETCO2 compared to PAECO2. When alveolar PCO2 was estimated by PETCO2, alveolar VD/VT was 18%, compared to an alveolar VD/VT of 26% when alveolar PCO2 was estimated by PAECO2. This difference was significantly magnified during PEEP ventilation. The overestimation of PAECO2 by PETCO2 can result in a falsely high assessment of overall alveolar PCO2. Moreover, the use of PETCO2 to estimate alveolar PCO2 in the determination of the alveolar dead space fraction can result in falsely low and even negative values of alveolar dead space.
The lower esophageal sphincter is composed of smooth muscles and is the main barrier against regurgitation during anesthesia. As smooth muscles are usually sensitive to CO2, we investigated the response of lower esophageal sphincter pressure to varying concentrations of CO2 in six anesthetized pigs using a manometric method. CO2 was increased by increasing the dead space at the Y piece of the ventilator. Basal values for ETCO2 were 35 +/- 2 mm Hg, reaching 62 +/- 1 mm Hg at the end of the study (P < 0.03). In response to the increase in ETCO2, no change in lower esophageal sphincter pressure was noted (12 +/- 3 mm Hg vs 13 +/- 4 mm Hg). These findings indicate that the lower esophageal sphincter is not affected by CO2 in the range usually encountered in clinical practice.