PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8366321

Advance directives for voluntary euthanasia: a volatile combination?

L P Francis
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Defenders of patient autonomy have successfully supported the legal adoption of advance directives. More recently, some defenders of patient autonomy have also supported the legalization of voluntary active euthanasia. This paper explores the wisdom of combining both practices. If euthanasia were to become legal, should it be permitted by advance directives? The paper juxtaposes the most significant doubts about advance directives, with the most significant doubts about euthanasia. It argues that the doubts together raise more concern about the combined practices than about either euthanasia or advance directives separately. Not all cases of voluntary euthanasia by advance directive are equally problematic, however. Advance directives can help in the defense of euthanasia for patients who make the request in advance and reaffirm it under circumstances of severe suffering.

Explore related subjects

Advance DirectivesBrain DiseasesComprehensionEuthanasiaEuthanasia, Active, VoluntaryHumansIntentionLiving WillsPersonal AutonomyPersonhoodRisk AssessmentSocial ValuesStress, PsychologicalUnited StatesVulnerable PopulationsWedge ArgumentWithholding TreatmentAnalytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L P Francis. 1993. Advance directives for voluntary euthanasia: a volatile combination?. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp%2F18.3.297

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

[Decision making concerning very old patients with deteriorating health living at home].

A woman aged 87 and three men aged 87, 86 and 83, respectively, lived at home or in an old-people's home, in poor physical condition due to old age and diseases such as COPD and heart failure. One man was demented, the others did not wish hospital admission in case of further deterioration. When the condition worsened due to infections and fractures, the GP to a limited extent performed diagnostics and treatment. The four patients died, three of them after admission and intensive treatment because the restricted policy had not been communicated clearly. In decision-making about the management of geriatric patients, it is important that the GP knows the patient's wishes, correctly assesses his physical condition and prognosis and communicates well with the patient's next of kin and other care-givers.

Advance Directives↗
PubMed2000

Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

The second part of this 2-part series on how to interpret qualitative research addresses, "what are the results," and, "how do they help me care for my patients?" Qualitative analysis is a process of summarizing and interpreting data to develop theoretical insights that describe and explain social phenomena such as interactions, experiences, roles, perspectives, symbols, and organizations. Key results are often illustrated with excerpts from interview transcripts, field notes, or documents. The results of a qualitative research report are best understood as an empirically based contribution to ongoing dialogue and exploration. Empirically based theory evolves from a process of exploration, discovery, analysis, and synthesis. Each concept should be defined carefully in a way that is meaningful to the reader. Concepts should be adequately developed and illustrated when theoretical conclusions are drawn. Arguments should be explained and justified. The qualitative research report ideally should address how the findings relate to other theories in the field. The qualitative study can provide a useful road map for understanding and navigating similar social settings interactions, or relationships. JAMA. 2000;284:478-482

Advance Directives↗
PubMed2000

Withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Seventy percent of deaths in intensive care units are preceded by decisions to limit life-support, most of which are made in consultation with the patient's family or other surrogates. Even when the outcome is clear, surrogates and physicians may deny that death is imminent and delay removing ventilatory assistance and other supportive measures. To avoid prolonging suffering, end-of-life decisions should always be guided by the interests and wishes of the patient.

Advance Directives↗