PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8398662

Techniques for percutaneous renal biopsies.

Abstract

The technique of renal biopsy includes the preparation of the patient, the localization of the kidneys, the biopsy itself and the postbiopsy care of the patient. A review of the literature and a survey of pediatric nephrologists practicing in the New York metropolitan area and in Philadelphia was used to determine what those techniques were. In preparation for biopsy, bleeding disorders are excluded and corrected if present. In units that localize the kidney by anatomical landmarks, a sonogram is performed at some earlier time to determine that the patient has two kidneys in the usual location. After sedation, patients are placed in the prone position, with a bolster under the abdomen. Sonography is the most commonly used localization method. This is followed by probing to confirm localization and depth. The Tru-Cut needle and the Franklin Vim Silverman needles are the two most commonly used. All nephrologists in the New York area then have the specimen examined to ensure adequacy of sampling. Postbiopsy care includes observation of vital signs, bed rest overnight and some limitation of activity for 2 days to 2 weeks subsequently. In the biopsy of renal allografts, palpation achieves adequate localization. The technique is otherwise the same as for the biopsy of native kidneys.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B G Gauthier, R S Mahadeo, H Trachtman. 1993. Techniques for percutaneous renal biopsies.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00857575

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗