PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8443666

Comparative study of abdominal incision techniques.

J R Telfer·G Canning·D J Galloway
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The characteristics of surgical incisions made with an electrosurgical technique were compared with those made using conventional methods in a prospective randomized trial. In particular, the claim that the method of incision may influence postoperative pain was investigated. A total of 101 consecutive patients receiving full-length midline laparotomy incisions for gastrointestinal resection were studied. A record was kept of the time required to make the incision and blood loss as well as postoperative pain (using a linear analogue scale), ventilatory function and requirement for analgesia. There were 50 patients in group 1 (scalpel; 15 men, 35 women) and 51 in group 2 (electrocautery; 26 men, 25 women). The groups were similar in age, body-weight, diagnosis and the type of surgical procedures being performed. Incision time was similar in the two groups but median blood loss during incision was significantly less in group 2 patients than in group 1 (10 versus 25 ml, P < 0.0001). Linear analogue pain scores were not significantly different between the groups at any stage after operation. The same was true of postoperative ventilatory function and requirement for analgesia. A total value for morphine use during the entire postoperative period was derived for each group and the median was 1.55 mg/kg for group 1 compared with 1.49 mg/kg for group 2. The electrosurgical method is associated with less blood loss during incision, although this study has failed to confirm any reduction in postoperative pain or requirement for analgesia in these patients.

Explore related subjects

Abdominal MusclesAdultAgedAnalgesiaElectrosurgeryFemaleHumansLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainTime FactorsClinical TrialComparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J R Telfer, G Canning, D J Galloway. 1993. Comparative study of abdominal incision techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800800238

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Effects of the mechanical load on forward bending motion of the trunk: comparison between patients with motion-induced intermittent low back pain and healthy subjects.

STUDY DESIGN: Postural changes and trunk muscle activities were examined in patients with motion-induced intermittent low back pain (MILBP) and healthy controls. OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability to maintain an upright standing position. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Since MILBP is not observed at rest, its pathophysiology is complicated to investigate. METHODS.: Postural changes were measured with a 3-dimensional motion analyzer, and muscle activities with a surface electromyography while 10 female patients at an average age of 76 years (MILBP group) and 10 healthy controls at an average age of 74 years (Control Group) were standing upright and loaded with 10-kg weights. RESULTS: In the Control Group, no significant forward bending motion occurred. In the MILBP group, there was a temporal increase in forward bending at various speeds and at various time phases. In the MILBP group but not in the Control Group, the rate of changes in median power frequency of erector spinae muscle declined significantly as compared with that in the Control Group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that fatigue of the back muscles occurred in MILBP patients and could be a pain generator in low back pain.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed2007

Critical illness VR rehabilitation device (X-VR-D): evaluation of the potential use for early clinical rehabilitation.

We present a new critical illness VR rehabilitation device (X-VR-D) that enables diversified self-training and is applicable early in the rehabilitation of severely injured or ill patients. The X-VR-D consists of a VR program delivering a virtual scene on a flat screen and simultaneously processing commands to a moving chair mounted on a motion system. Sitting in the moving chair and exposed to a virtual reality environment the device evokes anticipatory and reactive muscle contractions in trunk and extremities for postural control. In this study we tested the device in 10 healthy subjects to evaluate whether the enforced perturbations indeed evoke sufficient and reproducible EMG muscle activations. We found that particular fast roll and pitch movements evoke adequate trunk and leg muscle activity. Higher angular velocities and higher angles of inclination elicited broader EMG bursts and larger amplitudes. The muscle activation pattern was highly consistent between different subjects and although we found some habituation of EMG responses in consecutive training sessions, the general pattern was maintained and was predictable for specific movements. The habituation was characterized by more efficient muscle contractions and better muscle relaxation during the rest positions of the device. Furthermore we found that the addition of a virtual environment to the training session evoked more preparatory and anticipatory muscle activation than sessions without a virtual environment. We conclude that the X-VR-D is safe and effective to elicit consistent and reproducible muscle activity in trunk and leg muscles in healthy subjects and thus can be used as a training method.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed2007

Rehabilitative ultrasound measurement of select trunk muscle activation during induced pain.

Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) is considered a valid method to measure muscle activation in key spinal muscles in asymptomatic subjects. Research measuring muscle activation with RUSI in painful subjects is limited. The aim of this study was to determine if changes in muscle activation from experimentally induced pain can be measured by RUSI. Six male subjects performed tasks known to activate the transverse abdominis (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM) while RUSI measurements of muscle thickness were obtained during control and hypertonic saline conditions. The abdominal draw-in maneuver was used to volitionally activate the TrA and a series of upper extremity lifting tasks were used to automatically activate the LM. Pain was induced by injecting 5% hypertonic saline into the longissimus muscle adjacent to the LM at the L4 level. The percent change in muscle thickness from rest to contraction represented muscle activation. Activation was significantly less (p<0.01) during the painful condition on 4 of the 5 tasks performed for the LM and on the task performed for the TrA. These results indicate that RUSI can be used to measure pain-related changes in deep trunk muscle activation. Future research should include a larger sample size and women.

Abdominal Muscles↗