PubMed · 8445822
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C S Petty. JFK--an allonge.. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.269.12.1552
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Aside from recognized overgrowth syndromes, instances of visceromegaly are not uncommon at perinatal autopsy. The database of the University of Michigan Teratology Unit was screened for individual viscera exceeding the 90th centile for body and brain weight standards. The data were stratified for several maternal (hypertension, diabetes, obesity), gestational (chorioamnionitis, oligohydramnios, amniorrhaea, polyhydramnios), and fetal (body wall defect, cardiac malformation, renal malformation, diaphragmatic hernia, nonimmune hydrops, twin transfusion syndrome) characteristics and tested for statistically significant excessive numbers of heavy organs. The most striking associations were heavy adrenal glands and liver with chorioamnionitis, heavy heart with polyhydramnios and in the twin transfusion syndrome, and heavy heart and liver with nonimmune hydrops. Excessive brain weight for body weight had a number of correlations, each most likely reflecting growth restriction with sparing of brain growth.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of the study was to assess the reproducibility when different doctors fill in diagnoses on death certificates. Records from 40 patients who had died in 1994 during admission to a medical hospital department in Denmark were selected at random. Ten doctors filled in a death certificate for each patient (without knowledge of autopsy findings and results of examinations received after the patient's death). The agreement between the diagnoses was assessed using a rating scale with seven categories. Afterwards the 400 death certificates were mixed and coded by the Medicostatistical Section of the Danish National Board of Health. The diagnoses made by the ten doctors showed insignificant discrepancies in ten cases, larger discrepancies were found in eight cases and large discrepancies in 19 cases. In three cases the patient had died suddenly and little information was available. The coding was standardized at the Danish National Board of Health, but their diagnoses reflected the discrepancies between the doctors' diagnoses. In conclusion, the reproducibility of diagnoses on death certificates is so poor that information from the Registry of Causes of Death is of little use of administrative or scientific purposes.