PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8447104

Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception.

Abstract

Two studies are presented which explore how depth information is determined from conditions of transparency and whether this information combines with other depth information to determine the segmenting of motion information on the basis of likely surface boundaries. The first study explored how binocular disparity combines with monocular depth cues associated with transparency to determine whether subjects see one or multiple surfaces in depth in static displays. When transparency provided a depth cue that was consistent with binocular disparity, depth discrimination thresholds were at normal levels. However, if transparency was inconsistent with the binocular disparity, depth discrimination thresholds were elevated, indicating that subjects had difficulty seeing distinct surfaces lying in separate depth planes. Moreover, threshold elevations were found to correspond to the reductions in contrast between the intersecting contours of the stimulus, suggesting that the strength of perceived depth from transparency is the result of attenuated responses from competing contrast sensitive T-junction mechanisms responsible for the detection of opaque occlusion. A second experiment explored whether the grouping of local motion signals relied on surface interpretations that result from the interaction of transparency and disparity. Surface interpretations were manipulated in moving plaids by combining transparent layering and binocular disparity to show that the motion arising from contours is grouped together (pattern motion) when these cues support the existence of a single surface, and is segregated (component motion) when they support separate surfaces. When these cues were consistent, only small disparity differences were required for the gratings to appear as separately moving surfaces. However, when they were inconsistent, greater disparities were required (about a factor of 2 greater). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the grouping of local motion information is not resolved within the motion system alone. Information seemingly unrelated to motion processing, namely surface segmentation cues, is used to determine whether or not motion information arising from various contours is pooled together to determine a single motion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Trueswell, M M Hayhoe. 1993. Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(93)90088-e

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Nurses' judgments regarding seclusion and restraint of psychiatric patients: a social judgment analysis.

Clinical judgment of psychiatric nurses was investigated using judgment analysis within the framework of social judgment theory. Nine nurses at a short-term psychiatric care facility made recommendations concerning restraint and seclusion for 80 patients described on paper in terms of 17 characteristics (cues). Nurses generally favored close observation of patients over seclusion and restraint, and information about current behavior and functioning had more impact on nurses' judgments than did patient history. Nurses had good insight into the nature of their own judgments. However, individual differences in cue utilization and inconsistency in strategy usage led to disagreement among nurses about specific recommendations for particular patients. No one patient received identical recommendations from all nurses, and nurses agreed with each other on specific recommendations only about a third of the time. The lack of agreement has implications for development of staff training programs and further research on the clinical judgment processes of nurses.

Cues

Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone.

Liu, L., Stevenson, S.B., and Schor, C.M. (1994, Nature, 367, 66-669) reported quantitative stereoscopic depth in a phantom rectangle which appeared to lack conventional matching elements. Later, Gillam, B.J. (1995, Nature, 373, 202-203) and Liu, L., Stevenson, S.B., and Schor, C.M. (1995, Nature, 373, 203) and Liu, L., Stevenson, S.B., and Schor, C.M. (1997, Vision Research, 37(5), 633-644) indicated that the varying depth of the phantom rectangle could be based on stereoscopic matching. To remove the contaminating effects of conventional stereopsis from the Liu et al. (1994) original example, we presented a pair of parallel vertical lines to each eye where there is a central gap in the right line for the left eye's view and in the left line for the right eye's view. Observers saw a phantom rectangle bounded by subjective contours whose depth increased with the thickness of the lines. We attribute the quantitative variation of depth to a purely cyclopean (binocular) process sensitive to the pattern of contour presence and absence in the two eye's view.

Cues

Alignment of separated patches: multiple location tags.

Gaussian and Gabor patches can be accurately localized; however, it is not yet clear which cues (or location tags) the visual system utilizes for localization. To determine the cues used in spatial alignment, we measured and modelled the perceived shifts for asymmetric Gaussian and Gabor patches over a wide range of separations, patch sizes and orientations. For Gaussian patches we observed perceived shifts that were generally consistent with that of the centroid of the envelope. For Gabor patches we found that the perceived shift depends on the carrier orientation (whether co-axial or orthoaxial with the patch arrangement), separation (in units of carrier wavelength) and patch size (number of cycles per standard deviation). Gabor patches with the carrier orthoaxial (horizontal) to the three vertically arranged patches, were similar to Gaussian patches. However, Gabor patches with the carrier coaxial (vertical) to the three vertically arranged patches resulted in perceived shifts that were consistent with a number of alternate localization primitives. The selection of primitives was dependent on mainly the separation and patch size. Our results support the suggestion that the visual system can use multiple tags for location (Hess et al., Vis Res 1994;34:2439-2451; Badcock et al., Vis Res 1996;36:1467-1472).

Cues