PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8451377

A radon generator/delivery system.

Abstract

A radon-generating system is described in which 222Rn, emanating from 226Ra stored in an aluminum containment vessel, may be pumped into a syringe for subsequent injection into a standard spinner flask containing tissue culture medium. The radium-containment vessel is sealed by an indium gasket and three metal bellows valves, one of which was used to fracture the glass capsule that contained 2.9 GBq of radium salt. A rotating piston pump transfers radon-enriched air from the radium-containment vessel to a delivery loop that includes a transfer syringe. The flow of air and radon through the loop is manipulated by three crossover ball valves, one of which may be set to fill the syringe. A charcoal trap is provided to collect residual radon left in the delivery loop after the transfer syringe has been filled. The protocol used to expose cells to radon and its progeny is described as well as the dosimetry that is used to estimate the dose delivered to the cells. A description of safety precautions taken in fabricating the generator and in conducting radiobiological studies is also presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Bakale, P S Rao, J Mencl, R B Adams, H H Evans. 1993. A radon generator/delivery system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8451377/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Shielding performance and clinical applicability of lead-free materials in computed tomography.

Owing to the high radiation exposure associated with computed tomography (CT) examinations and the image quality degradation caused by conventional radiation shielding materials, this study evaluated the dose reduction performance and image quality maintenance potential of a newly developed lead-free composite shielding material. This material was composed of bismuth, tungsten, tungsten carbide, aluminium, and polyurethane. Phantom-based dose measurements demonstrated that the shielding material achieved dose reduction rates ranging from 17.6% to 37.6%, depending on tube voltage. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and changes in tube current-time product (mAs) under a scout-based automatic exposure control (AEC) protocol were analysed according to the presence or absence of the shielding material across regions. For the clinical evaluation, CT scans were performed on four patients. Furthermore, the images were reviewed to evaluate whether this material affected image quality. The shielding material exhibited radiation reduction levels comparable to those reported in previous studies. SNR and CNR analyses showed minor statistical variations in certain regions; however, most differences were not statistically significant, and even significant differences remained within a range that did not compromise diagnostic image quality. Under the scout-based AEC protocol, the use of the shielding material resulted in less than 1% variation in mAs values. No visually perceptible artefacts or clinically significant image quality degradation were observed. The proposed composite shielding material demonstrated the potential to mitigate some limitations of conventional shielding materials and showed preliminary clinical feasibility as an adjunctive strategy for radiation dose reduction in CT examinations.

Radiation Protection↗

Rheological behavior and the SPF of sunscreens.

Due to a large variety of sunscreens, it is important to study among other things, the effect of the vehicle on the thickness and uniformity of sunscreen films. In this study, we determined the physical stability of five sunscreens SPF 15 (FA to FG), containing or not PVP/eicosene crosspolymer (PVP/EC), and two different self-emulsifying bases (SEB), and also evaluated the influence of the vehicle in their SPF. In the study of physical stability, formulations were stored at 25, 37 and 45 degrees C, for 28 days. Viscosity and rheological behavior of the formulations were determined using a Brookfield rheometer. Investigations of the SPF were carried out in a group of 30 volunteers (COLIPA methodology). The FC samples (phosphate-based SEB), with a lower thixotropy, showed statistically higher SPF (13.6) when compared with FB (non-ionic SEB), which presented higher thixotropy and a SPF of 9.84. The FE sample (phosphate-based SEB+PVP/EC) presented the same SPF as the FC, but had a higher thixotropy. The FB formulation (stable with higher thixotropy) showed the lowest SPF while FC (an unstable formulation with lower thixotropy) presented a higher SPF. We concluded that FE was the best formulation showing a higher SPF and stability and the study of rheology can help the development of sunscreens.

Radiation Protection↗