PubMed · 8470769
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D M Parham. 1993. PNET vs MPNST.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199305000-00018
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.
BACKGROUND: Cribriform prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (C-PIN) identifies a unique histological pattern: dysplastic cells line ductal/acinar walls but also span across gland lumens. C-PIN is distinct from other forms of dysplasia; it is seldom seen except within invasive cancer, it is more frequent in larger/higher-grade cancers; and it appears to contribute independently to aggressive behavior. Hence, C-PIN may represent a separate, more aggressive entity: intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P). Here, support for that distinction stems from a histologic/biologic subclassification of IDC-P, whose elements are linked to features of invasive cancer. METHODS: Histologic criteria were tested against 26 radical prostatectomies, using immunostains for prostate-specific antigen, MUC-2, androgen receptor (differentiation), and Ki-67 (proliferation). Invasive cancer grade, stage, and follow-up were compared. RESULTS: Architecture of the central (luminal) cell compartment defined three subclasses of IDC-P: A (trabecular), B (cribriform), and C (solid/comedo), which represented progressive dedifferentiation with a reciprocal increase in proliferation. The IDC-P subpattern correlated with cancer stage, grade, and clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: IDC-P is a separate entity, distinct from PIN; cancers associated with IDC-P are more aggressive than those associated with only PIN. It comprises a spectrum of histological patterns which appear to be determined in concert with invasive cancer, whose prognosis it worsens.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.