PubMed1998
BACKGROUND: Most methods used to critically evaluate young surgeons for advancement or certification in surgery require oral communication skills, eg, case and research presentations, rounds, morbidity and mortality conferences, interviews, journal clubs and oral examinations. The irony, though, is that much of surgery training focuses on technical skill lists, and the rhetorical aspects are often neglected until the surgeon encounters failure in an oral examination or is sued for not "talking" appropriately. Early identification of those at risk for difficulty with oral skills would provide programs with time needed to arrange for the appropriate types of interventions. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify those medical students with high communication apprehension scores in dyadic, group, or public speaking situations before they encountered failure and caused problems, not only for themselves, but also for their programs and practices. METHODS: Two scales, Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension (PRCA-24), were administered to medical students at two large university medical centers during new student orientation to the surgery rotation. The WTC is a 20-item probability-estimate scale designed to measure one's predisposition toward approaching or avoiding the initiation of communication. The PRCA-24 is a scale designed to measure one's fear associated with either real or anticipated communication in four different contexts. In addition to the 44 items, a lengthy list of demographic items was added for possible correlations. These items were based on the student's perception of the communication or language environment in which he was raised. Therefore, a student ranked past and future socioeconomic status (eg, blue collar or white collar) according to his or her own criteria. The chairman was provided with a list of individual scores. Those students who were below the group means on skills required during a surgery rotation were identified for immediate intervention. RESULTS: The published data show a norm mean of 65.6 for PRCA-24 and 65.2 for WTC for college students. The current study found medical students to be more willing to communicate (WTC) and less anxious about communication (PRCA-24) than college students (mean 70.7 versus 65.2, P = 0.003, and 61.6 versus 65.6, P = 0.01, respectively). This difference was accentuated for blue-collar medical students compared with college students and persisted when blue-collar medical students were compared with white-collar medical students (73.9 blue-collar versus 70.9 college students, P = 0.15 for WTC, and 58.5 blue-collar versus 63.6 white-collar, P = 0.002 for PRCA-24). Male medical students were found to be less anxious about communication than female medical students. CONCLUSIONS: These instruments are easily administered at orientation and produce simple class lists with individual scores. They can be used to identify students who are below the mean for specific forms of communication before they encounter failure.