PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8473626

Dichotic interference effects in gap detection.

B C Moore·M J Shailer·M J Black
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Thresholds for detecting a temporal gap in a 20-Hz-wide band of noise (the target) were measured for the target alone, and in the presence of multiple 20-Hz-wide flanking bands presented to the opposite ear. The flanking bands caused gap thresholds to increase, and this effect was greater at higher levels of the flanking bands. The impairment to gap detection was greater when the flanking bands were comodulated with the target (i.e., had the same envelope) than when they were not comodulated, except at very low and high levels of the flanking bands. A series of supplementary experiments was conducted to investigate why the difference between comodulated and noncomodulated bands was reduced at high levels. The results suggest that this was not due to inter-aural crosstalk. It may have been partly caused by: (1) a central masking effect that reduced the effective sensation level of the target band at high levels of the contralateral flanking bands; (2) reduced independence of the flanking bands owing to broadening of the auditory filters at high levels. The results are discussed in terms of perceptual grouping processes.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdDichotic Listening TestsFemaleHearingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B C Moore, M J Shailer, M J Black. 1993. Dichotic interference effects in gap detection.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406674

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Morphology and physiology of auditory and vibratory ascending interneurones in bushcrickets.

Auditory/vibratory interneurones of the bushcricket species Decticus albifrons and Decticus verrucivorus were studied with intracellular dye injection and electrophysiology. The morphologies of five physiologically characterised auditory/vibratory interneurones are shown in the brain, subesophageal and prothoracic ganglia. Based on their physiology, these five interneurones fall into three groups, the purely auditory or sound neurones: S-neurones, the purely vibratory V-neurones, and the bimodal vibrosensitive VS-neurones. The S1-neurones respond phasically to airborne sound whereas the S4-neurones exhibit a tonic spike pattern. Their somata are located in the prothoracic ganglion and they show an ascending axon with dendrites located in the prothoracic, subesophageal ganglia, and the brain. The VS3-neurone, responding to both auditory and vibratory stimuli in a tonic manner, has its axon traversing the brain, the suboesophageal ganglion and the prothoracic ganglion although with dendrites only in the brain. The V1- and V2-neurones respond to vibratory stimulation of the fore- and midlegs with a tonic discharge pattern, and our data show that they receive inhibitory input suppressing their spontaneous activity. Their axon transverses the prothoracic ganglion, subesophageal ganglion and terminate in the brain with dendritic branching. Thus the auditory S-neurones have dendritic arborizations in all three ganglia (prothoracic, subesophageal, and brain) compared to the vibratory (V) and vibrosensitive (VS) neurones, which have dendrites almost only in the brain. The dendrites of the S-neurones are also more extensive than those of the V-, VS-neurones. V- and VS-neurones terminate more laterally in the brain. Due to an interspecific comparison of the identified auditory interneurones the S1-neurone is found to be homologous to the TN1 of crickets and other bushcrickets, and the S4-neurone also can be called AN2. J. Exp. Zool. 286:219-230, 2000.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2000

Sensitive period for sensorimotor integration during vocal motor learning.

Sensory experience during sensitive periods in development may direct the organization of neural substrates, thereby permanently influencing subsequent adult behavior. We report a sensitive period during the imitative motor learning phase of sensorimotor integration in birdsong development. By temporarily and reversibly blocking efference to the vocal muscles, we disrupted vocal motor practice during selected stages of song development. Motor disruption during prolonged periods early in development, which allows recovery of vocal control prior to the onset of adult song, has no effect on adult song production. However, song disruption late in development, during the emergence of adult song, results in permanent motor defects in adult song production. These results reveal a decreased ability to compensate for interference with motor function when disturbances occur during the terminal stage of vocal motor development. Temporary disruption of syringeal motor control in adults does not produce permanent changes in song production. Permanent vocal aberrations in juveniles are evident exclusively in learned song elements rather than nonlearned calls, suggesting that the sensitive period is associated with motor learning.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2000

Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex.

The human voice contains in its acoustic structure a wealth of information on the speaker's identity and emotional state which we perceive with remarkable ease and accuracy. Although the perception of speaker-related features of voice plays a major role in human communication, little is known about its neural basis. Here we show, using functional magnetic resonance imaging in human volunteers, that voice-selective regions can be found bilaterally along the upper bank of the superior temporal sulcus (STS). These regions showed greater neuronal activity when subjects listened passively to vocal sounds, whether speech or non-speech, than to non-vocal environmental sounds. Central STS regions also displayed a high degree of selectivity by responding significantly more to vocal sounds than to matched control stimuli, including scrambled voices and amplitude-modulated noise. Moreover, their response to stimuli degraded by frequency filtering paralleled the subjects' behavioural performance in voice-perception tasks that used these stimuli. The voice-selective areas in the STS may represent the counterpart of the face-selective areas in human visual cortex; their existence sheds new light on the functional architecture of the human auditory cortex.

Acoustic Stimulation↗