PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8498468

Hand function evaluation: a factor analysis study.

T Jarus·R Poremba
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate hand function evaluations. Factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to assess the fundamental characteristics of the items included in the Jebsen Hand Function Test and the Smith Hand Function Evaluation. The study sample consisted of 144 subjects without disabilities and 22 subjects with Colles fracture. Results suggest a four factor solution: Factor I--pinch movement; Factor II--grasp; Factor III--target accuracy; and Factor IV--activities of daily living. These categories differentiated the subjects without Colles fracture from the subjects with Colles fracture. A hand function evaluation consisting of these four factors would be useful. Such an evaluation that can be used for current clinical purposes is provided.

Explore related subjects

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColles' FractureFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational TherapyReference ValuesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Jarus, R Poremba. 1993. Hand function evaluation: a factor analysis study.. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.5.439

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settings.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outcomes and costs differ for elderly patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals, subacute nursing homes, and traditional nursing homes. DESIGN: Inception cohort stratified by provider type and followed prospectively for 6 months. SETTING: A total of 92 hospital-based units and freestanding facilities from 17 states. PATIENTS: A total of 518 randomly selected patients with hip fracture and 485 stroke patients admitted from November 1991 to February 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 6 months comparing community residence, recovery to premorbid levels in 5 activities of daily living (ADLs), Medicare costs, and the number of therapy and physician visits. Outcomes were adjusted for premorbid residence and function, caregiver availability, comorbid illness, admission function, cognition, depression, sensory deficits, and mobility impairments. RESULTS: On admission, rehabilitation hospital patients were more likely (P<.001) to have caregivers and better cognitive and physical function. Hip fracture patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals did not differ from patients admitted to nursing homes in returning to the community (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.6) or in the number of ADLs recovered to premorbid level (difference, 0.09 ADL; 95% CI, -0.27-0.44), but stroke patients admitted to rehabilitation hospitals were more likely to return to the community (adjusted OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.2) and recover ADLs (difference, 0.63 ADL; 95% CI, 0.20-1.07). Subacute nursing home patients with stroke were more likely than traditional nursing home patients to return to the community (adjusted OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.2-21.4), there was no difference in return to the community for patients with hip fracture (adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.7-3.6), and there were no differences in recovery of ADLs for either condition. Medicare costs were greater (P<.001) for rehabilitation hospital patients than for subacute nursing home patients, and the costs for subacute nursing home patients were greater (P=.03 for stroke and .009 for hip fracture) than for traditional nursing home patients. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings are consistent with enhanced outcomes for elderly patients with stroke treated in rehabilitation hospitals but not for patients with hip fracture. Subacute nursing homes were more effective than traditional nursing homes in returning patients with stroke to the community, despite comparable functional outcomes.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of structured exercise programs on self-reported disability in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. SETTING AND DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial lasting 18 months conducted at 2 academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 439 community-dwelling adults, aged 60 years or older, with radiographically evident knee osteoarthritis, pain, and self-reported physical disability. INTERVENTIONS: An aerobic exercise program, a resistance exercise program, and a health education program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self-reported disability score (range, 1-5). The secondary outcomes were knee pain score (range, 1-6), performance measures of physical function, x-ray score, aerobic capacity, and knee muscle strength. RESULTS: A total of 365 (83%) participants completed the trial. Overall compliance with the exercise prescription was 68% in the aerobic training group and 70% in the resistance training group. Postrandomization, participants in the aerobic exercise group had a 10% lower adjusted mean (+/- SE) score on the physical disability questionnaire (1.71 +/- 0.03 vs 1.90 +/- 0.04 units; P<.001), a 12% lower score on the knee pain questionnaire (2.1 +/- 0.05 vs 2.4 +/- 0.05 units; P=.001), and performed better (mean [+/- SE]) on the 6-minute walk test (1507 +/- 16 vs 1349 +/- 16 ft; P<.001), mean (+/-SE) time to climb and descend stairs (12.7 +/- 0.4 vs 13.9 +/- 0.4 seconds; P=.05), time to lift and carry 10 pounds (9.1 +/- 0.2 vs 10.0 +/- 0.1 seconds; P<.001), and mean (+/-SE) time to get in and out of a car (8.7 +/- 0.3 vs 10.6 +/- 0.3 seconds; P<.001) than the health education group. The resistance exercise group had an 8% lower score on the physical disability questionnaire (1.74 +/- 0.04 vs 1.90 +/- 0.03 units; P=.003), 8% lower pain score (2.2 +/- 0.06 vs 2.4 +/- 0.05 units; P=.02), greater distance on the 6-minute walk (1406 +/- 17 vs 1349 +/- 16 ft; P=.02), faster times on the lifting and carrying task (9.3 +/- 0.1 vs 10.0 +/- 0.16 seconds; P=.001), and the car task (9.0 +/- 0.3 vs 10.6 +/- 0.3 seconds; P=.003) than the health education group. There were no differences in x-ray scores between either exercise group and the health education group. CONCLUSIONS: Older disabled persons with osteoarthritis of the knee had modest improvements in measures of disability, physical performance, and pain from participating in either an aerobic or a resistance exercise program. These data suggest that exercise should be prescribed as part of the treatment for knee osteoarthritis.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of perceived difficulty experienced by patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in the performance of everyday activities and to determine the correlation between patients' self-reported difficulty and clinical measures of visual function. METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven patients with typical RP and Usher syndrome type 2, with a wide range of disease severity, rated their difficulty in the performance of 33 activities. We obtained data on visual acuity and visual field area for all patients, and electroretinogram (ERG) recordings on a subgroup of 49 of these patients. Results from the questionnaire were analyzed with factor analysis, and patients' self-reports were compared with their clinical data using correlational analyses and multiple regression. RESULTS: The patients' questionnaire responses clustered into 6 factors: activities involving central vision, miscellaneous activities (no discernible common factor), activities related to mobility, driving, negotiating steps, and eating meals. Of the clinical tests, visual acuity was most strongly related to the patients' ratings of their difficulty in performance. Visual field area also was related to patients' self-assessments but not as strongly as visual acuity. Because visual field area and the ERG measures were correlated, adding ERG information did not improve predictability. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RP, perceived difficulty in performing common tasks was most strongly related to level of visual acuity and visual fields. Although certain ERG amplitude measures did show positive correlations with some self-reported activities, overall, the ERG amplitude measures showed the least relationship with patients' self-reports. Our results provide insight into RP patients' perceived difficulties in performing everyday activities and the clinical measures of visual function that most highly correlate with these difficulties.

Activities of Daily Living↗