PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8501267

Saccades.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Brown, R Kapoor, J Brown. 1993. Saccades.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8501267/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Computer-assisted analysis of fetal movements in intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR).

A quantitative analysis of various fetal activities (mouth, eye and gross body movements) was made in 10 IUGR human fetuses. The aim of the study was to see whether IUGR fetuses move differently to normal fetuses. Each real-time ultrasound recording lasted 1 h and the analysis of various activities was carried out during replay of video recordings by means of a specially designed computer program. The following aspects have been investigated: (1) incidence, duration and interval for each of the fetal activities described; (2) the relationship between incidence, duration and interval for each single activity; (3) the correlations between the different activities. The results were compared with a group of 10 fetuses from normal pregnancies. On quantitative evaluation no clear effects due to uncomplicated IUGR could be detected except for median duration of eye movements, which turned out to be longer in the IUGR group. The evaluation of correlations between the characteristics (incidence, duration and interval) of each activity showed a positive correlation between incidence and duration of mouthing movements in the IUGR group, not found in the normal group. The study of the correlation between different fetal activities has shown an inverse correlation between mouthing and other activities in the normal fetuses, not found in the IUGR group. We conclude that in mildly affected fetuses with no evidence of hypoxia, there are no quantitative differences compared to normal fetuses in terms of the motility studied. The only differences found were in relation to the performance of such activities and they could reflect a dysfunction of the central nervous system resulting from a metabolic disturbance.

Eye Movements

Spatial disparity affects visual-auditory interactions in human sensorimotor processing.

Information from the auditory and visual systems converges in the nervous system with physiological and behavioral consequences. Most of our knowledge about the rules governing such convergence has been obtained in experiments where the strength or the timing of the individual auditory and visual stimuli has been varied. Relatively little attention has been paid to the spatial relationship between different modalities of stimuli in multisensory experiments. We studied saccadic reaction times of human subjects to bimodal auditory and visual stimulus presentations under two conditions: first, with the targets spatially coincident and, second, with various degrees of spatial separation or disparity. In the first experiment, we found that the saccadic reaction times were consistently shorter than would be predicted by independent processing of information about the visual and auditory targets. These results suggest convergence of multimodal information at one or more loci within the nervous system. In the second experiment, we found that saccadic latency gradually increased as spatial distance between the auditory and visual targets increased. Evidence for neural summation was found over a wide range of spatial disparities. These results suggest that multisensory information can be integrated and have significant influences on behavior over a surprisingly large range of spatial disparity.

Eye Movements

Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency.

In Experiments 1-3, we monitored search performance as a function of target eccentricity under display durations that either allowed or precluded eye movements. The display was present either until observers responded, for 104 msec, or for 62 msec. In all three experiments an orientation asymmetry emerged: observers detected a tilted target among vertical distracters more efficiently than a vertical target among vertical distracters. As target eccentricity increased, reaction times and errors augmented, and the set size effect became more pronounced, more so for vertical than tilted targets. In Experiments 4-7, the stimulus spatial properties were manipulated: spatial frequency; size; and orientation. The eccentricity effect was more pronounced for vertical than tilted targets and for high- than low-spatial frequency targets. This effect was eliminated when either the size, the size and orientation, or the size and spatial frequency were magnified (M-cortical factor). By increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, magnification reduced the extent of both asymmetries; it aided more the detection of tilted than vertical and of high- than low-spatial frequency targets. Experiments 4-7 indicate that performance improvement in the magnified conditions was due to the specific pairing of stimulus size with retinal eccentricity and not to the larger stimulus size of the magnified conditions. We conclude that stimulus size, orientation and spatial frequency influence the extent of the eccentricity effect and the efficiency of search performance.

Eye Movements