PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8646299

Making a performance improvement plan work.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A carefully crafted organizational performance improvement (PI) plan can guide implementation and demonstrate that the organization is serious about continuously improving its processes and patient care outcomes. A good plan provides an overview of both the processes that are used to achieve PI and the expected outcomes. This article describes the process by which St John's Regional Medical Center (Joplin, Mo) developed and implemented its P1 plan. DEVELOPING THE PI PLAN: The first task is to define the desired PI program elements, such as use of teams and teamwork, measurement and monitoring systems, resource management tools, work redesign and reengineering, and customer-focused care. Then cultural changes to support the PI system need to be identified; the plan should include specific strategies to avoid or overcome any possible stumbling blocks. THE PI PLAN IN ACTION: As an example of customer-focused improvement, intensive care unit nurses formed a team to address customer complaints about waiting room policies and physical facilities. An open visiting policy was initiated, pagers for family members of patients were provided, and the waiting room was made more comfortable. Use of resource management tools is illustrated by the development of algorithms and pathways to address variation in care provided to patients with complicated and uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. LESSONS LEARNED: Expectations for involvement from the top should be set, holding managers and employees accountable for participating appropriately; hospital departments and the medical staff should be integrated as soon as possible; and bureaucratic requirements should be kept to a minimum.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Carter, H Meridy. 1996. Making a performance improvement plan work.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30212-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗