PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8647069

'Prevention programmes'--a dietetic minefield.

Abstract

Food allergy and intolerance (FAI) is undoubtedly a controversial subject surrounded by a great deal of publicity. One of the most confusing issues arises when considering the value of allergy prevention programmes. Although prevention strategies have now been extensively studied the results are still inconclusive. In childhood, atopic disorders eg asthma, eczema, dermatitis, urticaria, rhinitis and gastrointestinal related symptoms are relatively common with estimates of their prevalence ranging from two to 20 per cent (Mallet & Henocq, 1992). In addition, the proportion of young children with allergies seems to be increasing, although the extent to which food allergens contribute remains unclear (Hide, 1991; Croner, 1992; DoH, 1994). In many of these cases, prevention of unpleasant, socially and psychologically disruptive and sometimes life threatening symptoms can be achieved by dietary modification. If atopic and gastrointestinal symptoms can be prevented growth failure may not be a problem, children may miss less schooling, and if long term prevention is achieved there may be a substantial reduction in the cost of medical care these children would otherwise require. Before prevention programmes are introduced, however, careful thought should be given to the implications of dietary treatment. The programmes are difficult to administrate in terms of both resources and expense. Specifically, from a nutritional point of view, the diets employed are often socially disruptive which inevitably leads to problems with compliance. Nutritional adequacy may also be difficult to achieve unless there is close supervision by a dietitian who is experienced in the management of the complex dietary manipulations involved. Unfortunately the dietetic resources essential for the safety of the programmes may be lacking in many hospitals. Preventive practice may be aimed at either the general population or at specially identified group who are considered to be at a greater risk of developing atopic disorders. Dietary intervention studies looking at prevention in this 'at risk' group have considered maternal dietary modification during pregnancy and lactation, the use of soya and hydrolysed protein feeds and the weaning diet. The nutritional consequences of these methods of dietary manipulation will be discussed in more detail.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S P Wolfe. 1995. 'Prevention programmes'--a dietetic minefield.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8647069/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Beta-glucuronidase and hyperbilirubinemia in breast-Fed babies.

In the present study we analyzed breast milk samples from mothers of breast-fed, healthy, term babies with unexplained prolonged jaundice for beta-glucuronidase activity. The differences of enzyme activity were not statistically significant in comparison to a control group of nonjaundiced newborns. We conclude that beta-glucuronidase is not the only cause of prolonged jaundice in neonates.

Breast Feeding

Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and later intelligence quotient.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether perinatal nutrition influences cognitive function at 7 1/2 - 8 years in children born preterm. DESIGN: Randomised, blinded nutritional intervention trial. Blinded follow up at 7 1/2 - 8 years. SETTING: Intervention phase in two neonatal units; follow up in a clinic or school setting. SUBJECTS: 424 preterm infants who weighed under 1850 g at birth; 360 of those who survived were tested at 7 1/2 - 8 years. INTERVENTIONS: Standard infant formula versus nutrient enriched preterm formula randomly assigned as sole diet (trial A) or supplements to maternal milk (trial B) fed for a mean of 1 month. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intelligence quotient (IQ) at 7 1/2 - 8 years with abbreviated Weschler intelligence scale for children (revised). RESULTS: There was a major sex difference in the impact of diet. At 7 1/2 - 8 years boys previously fed standard versus preterm formula as sole diet had a 12.2 point disadvantage (95% confidence interval 3.7 to 20.6; P<0.01) in verbal IQ. In those with highest intakes of trial diets corresponding figures were 9.5 point disadvantage and 14.4 point disadvantage in overall IQ (1.2 to 17.7; P<0.05) and verbal IQ (5.7 to 23.2; P<0.01). Consequently, more infants fed term formula had low verbal IQ (<85): 31% versus 14% for both sexes (P=0.02) and 47% versus 13% in boys P=0.009). There was a higher incidence of cerebral palsy in those fed term formula; exclusion of such children did not alter the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm infants are vulnerable to suboptimal early nutrition in terms of their cognitive performance--notably, language based skills--at 7 1/2 - 8 years, when cognitive scores are highly predictive of adult ones. Our data on cerebral palsy generate a new hypothesis that suboptimal nutritional management during a critical or plastic early period of rapid brain growth could impair functional compensation in those sustaining an earlier brain insult. Cognitive function, notably in males, may be permanently impaired by suboptimal neonatal nutrition.

Breast Feeding