PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8651496

Dynamic delay and maximal dynamic error in continuous biosensors.

Abstract

When biosensors are operated continuously, a dynamic delay and a dynamic error relate the sensor signal to the changing analyte concentration. The dynamic delay is the temporal displacement of the signal, or the lag, and is specified solely by properties of the biosensor and external mass transfer. The dynamic error is the difference between the actual concentration and the simultaneous reported concentration and is the product of the dynamic delay and the instantaneous rate of concentration change. In real-time operation of sensors, a maximal dynamic error based on the maximal expected rate of concentration change must be employed to estimate the worst-case error because the actual instantaneous rate is not independently known. Values of dynamic delay and maximal dynamic error that are acceptable in particular monitoring situations can be used in the design of acceptable continuous biosensors. This analysis suggests experimental alternatives to the standard response time approach for sensor characterization that are particularly advantageous for continuously operated biosensors. The concepts are applied here to in vitro operation of a continuous glucose sensor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Baker, D A Gough. 1996-04-15. Dynamic delay and maximal dynamic error in continuous biosensors.. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac960030d

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

From host response to genomic targets: electrochemical biosensing of tuberculosis biomarkers.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of death from a single infectious agent worldwide, with timely diagnosis continuing to be a major challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. Conventional TB diagnostic methods are limited by low sensitivity, long turnaround times, and an inability to reliably differentiate latent from active disease. Biomarker-based diagnostic strategies have therefore gained increasing attention as they offer the potential to improve early detection, disease differentiation, and treatment monitoring. Herein, we examine electrochemical biosensing strategies for TB diagnostics using a biomarker-class-driven framework, covering host-response biomarkers (IFN-γ and TNF-α), pathogen-derived antigens (ESAT6, CFP10, CFP10-ESAT6, MPT64, Ag85, HspX and LpqH), cell-wall signatures and whole-cell markers (LAM and whole cell Mtb), and genomic markers (Mtb DNA and IS6110). Through structured comparison of recognition elements, biointerface designs, signal amplification strategies, electrochemical techniques, matrices, and validation levels, this review identifies the most promising technical approaches for different TB biomarker classes. It further highlights key translational bottlenecks, including limited clinical validation, buffer-based testing, complex multistep amplification, redox-probe dependence, matrix fouling, and insufficient evidence of manufacturability. This review therefore provides practical guidance for developing electrochemical TB biosensors that are analytically sensitive, clinically relevant, and suitable for decentralized diagnostic applications.

Biosensing Techniques↗

Metal-organic frameworks nanozyme-integrated portable microneedle patch for visual bacterial monitoring in meat.

Foodborne microbial contamination is a major global health concern, with conventional methods often being time-consuming and complex. Herein, we developed a novel portable biosensor by integrating microneedle patch technology and a metal-organic framework (Fe/Cu-NBDC MOF) nanozyme, enabling rapid, on-site, visual detection of bacteria in meat. The sensing system works by encapsulating aptamer-functionalized MOF nanozymes within a hydrogel patch, where their catalytic sites are initially blocked by the aptamer. In the presence of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) as the target, the specific aptamer's binding to bacteria exposes numerous catalytic sites, further activating the chromogenic reaction of the tetramethylbenzidine‑hydrogen peroxide (TMB-H₂O₂) system, enabling visual detection of S. aureus. The biosensor demonstrates a detection limit of 82 CFU/mL with excellent specificity to successfully apply to commercial mutton. By integrating sampling, enrichment, and visual detection into a single compact device, this platform offers a practical, efficient solution for rapid on-site screening of foodborne pathogens.

Biosensing Techniques↗

All solid-state GFP sensor.

An all-solid-state green fluorescent protein (GFP) sensor for GFP measurement was developed. It is immune to interference from ambient light and works with standard flow-through cuvettes. The sensor is practically insensitive to the scattered excitation light encountered in microbial suspensions. It has a range of 0.0002-1 g/L (7.4 x 10(-9) - 3.7 x 10(-5) M) with limit of detection 0.00019 g/L (7.0 x 10(-9) M). The sensor could be used with a UV or blue light emitting diode (LED) as a light source, depending on required sensitivity, selectivity, and background levels. Its very low cost makes it useful in a variety of applications. This article describes the construction and validation of the sensor both off- and on-line in fermentation processes.

Biosensing Techniques↗