PubMed · 8695437
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C Rayner. 1996-02-14. Bottling up.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.10.21.19.s31
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
To gain a better understanding of the development of sucking behavior in low birth weight infants, the aims of this study were as follows: (1) to assess these infants' oral feeding performance when milk delivery was unrestricted, as routinely administered in nurseries, versus restricted when milk flow occurred only when the infant was sucking; (2) to determine whether the term sucking pattern of suction/ expression was necessary for feeding success; and (3) to identify clinical indicators of successful oral feeding. Infants (26 to 29 weeks of gestation) were evaluated at their first oral feeding and on achieving independent oral feeding. Bottle nipples were adapted to monitor suction and expression. To assess performance during a feeding, proficiency (percent volume transferred during the first 5 minutes of a feeding/total volume ordered), efficiency (volume transferred per unit time), and overall transfer (percent volume transferred) were calculated. Restricted milk flow enhanced all three parameters. Successful oral feeding did not require the term sucking pattern. Infants who demonstrated both a proficiency > or = 30% and efficiency > or = 1.5 ml/min at their first oral feeding were successful with that feeding and attained independent oral feeding at a significantly earlier postmenstrual age than their counterparts with lower proficiency, efficiency, or both. Thus a restricted milk flow facilitates oral feeding in infants younger than 30 weeks of gestation, the term sucking pattern is not necessary for successful oral feeding, and proficiency and efficiency together may be used as reliable indicators of early attainment of independent oral feeding in low birth weight infants.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Unabsorbed carbohydrates are fermented by colonic bacteria to short chain fatty acids (SCFA) which are rapidly absorbed, salvaging energy and reducing stool output. There are marked differences between the faecal flora and SCFA of breast fed (BF) and formula fed (FF) infants which may be related to the higher incidence of diarrhoea in FF infants. Part of this effect may be caused by a difference in the ability of the microflora to ferment carbohydrate. To test the hypothesis that BF and FF have different fermentation capacities for simple and complex carbohydrates, in vitro cultures of faeces from healthy infants (2-10 weeks; 11 BF, 11 FF) containing glucose, lactose, raftilose (a fructo-oligosaccharide), or soybean polysaccharide were incubated anaerobically. Results were compared with those of adult faecal cultures using the same carbohydrates. Cultures of faeces from BF and FF infants produced comparable amounts of total SCFA in all cultures. These cultures produced less SCFA than those from adult faeces and produced very little SCFA from complex carbohydrate. BF cultures produced more acetic acid than FF in all cultures, whereas FF cultures produced more propionate with sugars and more butyrate with raftilose. Both groups of infants produced less butyrate than adults in all cultures. Thus it is unlikely that a lower ability to ferment carbohydrate is a major cause of increased risk of diarrhoea in FF fed infants but individual SCFA production may be important.