PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8708251

Problem-based learning in an undergraduate nursing programme: a case study.

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, the 'theory-practice gap' has been a recurrent theme in the nurse education literature. Numerous explanations are put forward for its existence, along with many suggestions as to how the apparent divide can be bridged. A key component of nursing practice is problem-solving but not all nurses are competent at finding suitable solutions to the problems they face in practice settings. Therefore ways of developing learner proficiency in problem-solving is crucial and should occupy a substantial part of teacher activity. One recent educational method for promoting problem-solving skills is problem-based learning [PBL] using the hypothetico-deductive technique. This approach encourages students to work through problem situations, generating hypotheses and testing these against the relevant literature and personal experience. The process itself is seen as the essential element in developing problem-solving skills, so that when the students are qualified they can apply the same methods to patient care. This paper explores the use of the PBL approach with a group of 11 fourth-year undergraduate students. The method employed was a case study design using observation as the main data collection technique. Subsequent analysis focused on: (a) practice; (b) teaching method; (c) knowledge attainment; and (d) the role of the teacher.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Andrews, P R Jones. 1996. Problem-based learning in an undergraduate nursing programme: a case study.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb02679.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe doctors' prognostic accuracy in terminally ill patients and to evaluate the determinants of that accuracy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five outpatient hospice programmes in Chicago. PARTICIPANTS: 343 doctors provided survival estimates for 468 terminally ill patients at the time of hospice referral. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' estimated and actual survival. RESULTS: Median survival was 24 days. Only 20% (92/468) of predictions were accurate (within 33% of actual survival); 63% (295/468) were overoptimistic and 17% (81/468) were overpessimistic. Overall, doctors overestimated survival by a factor of 5.3. Few patient or doctor characteristics were associated with prognostic accuracy. Male patients were 58% less likely to have overpessimistic predictions. Non-oncology medical specialists were 326% more likely than general internists to make overpessimistic predictions. Doctors in the upper quartile of practice experience were the most accurate. As duration of doctor-patient relationship increased and time since last contact decreased, prognostic accuracy decreased. CONCLUSION: Doctors are inaccurate in their prognoses for terminally ill patients and the error is systematically optimistic. The inaccuracy is, in general, not restricted to certain kinds of doctors or patients. These phenomena may be adversely affecting the quality of care given to patients near the end of life.

Clinical Competence