PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8716471

Changing nursing practice--trisectoral collaboration in decision making.

Abstract

In an age of cost containment, agency partnerships have become an essential element for future planning and program implementation. This paper describes a trisectoral collaboration of a hospital, health department, university and school of nursing to compare the efficacy and efficiency of referral decisions of hospital staff nurses to those of the public health liaison nurses (LNs). A process to identify decision criteria was undertaken and an educational programme was designed to assist the staff nurses with the referral process and to assure consistency of decision making. The two groups were then compared. The results of the study found staff nurses, using the decision criteria, identified more patients who required public health nursing visits than did the liaison nurses, refusal rate of the patients to participate was no different, staff nurses cost less than LNs and job satisfaction was not significantly altered for either group. In addition to providing information to guide administrative and clinical decision making, the project also provided a learning experience for the staff of three agencies in conducting research and in using evidence-based practice to change traditional practice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Ciliska, A Mitchell, A Baumann, K Sheppard, C Van Berkel, V Adam, J Underwood, D Southwell. Changing nursing practice--trisectoral collaboration in decision making.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8716471/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Decision Making, Organizational↗