PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8726919

Head and neck reconstruction.

Abstract

Reconstructive procedures of the head and neck aim to repair soft tissue and bony defects while restoring optimal function and cosmesis. Defects necessitating reconstruction may be the result of congenital anomalies, destructive disease processes, trauma, or surgery. Because primary wound closure is often impossible in these settings and healing by secondary intention provides unacceptable appearance and function, tissues from elsewhere in the body are usually mobilized to achieve the reconstructive goals. Reconstructions using tissue grafts and flaps have unique characteristics on postoperative imaging that differ from the original tissues being replaced, as well as the appearance of the donor size prior to transposition. As these reconstructive techniques become more sophisticated, it is crucial that physicians have an appreciation for current reconstructive methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D G Deschler, R E Hayden. 1996. Head and neck reconstruction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8726919/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multidetector CT and dentascan software: dosimetric evaluation and technique improvement.

PURPOSE: The development of new operative techniques in oral and maxillofacial surgery within the last few years has led to an increasing demand for Dentascan examination, also in paediatric patients. It is necessary to modify acquisition parameters to reduce the absorbed dose. The aim of this study was to define a Dentascan protocol in which a reduced X-ray dose could be used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimeters were applied to the eyes, mouth, parotid glands, thyroid and back of the neck of an anthropomorphic Plexiglas phantom that underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) Dentascan examinations. Both 120kV and 80 kV were used to study the mandibular and maxillary arches. RESULTS: Examinations obtained with the 80 kV protocol showed a ten-fold reduction in the absorbed dose, without affecting image quality. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a Dentascan protocol that reduces the X-ray dose administered to the patient while ensuring the same high diagnostic accuracy.

Head↗