Relations between problem orientation and optimism, pessimism, and trait affectivity: a construct validation study.

E C Chang; T J D'Zurilla

doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00046-1

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8741726

Relations between problem orientation and optimism, pessimism, and trait affectivity: a construct validation study.

E C Chang·T J D'Zurilla

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This study investigated the construct validity of the Positive and Negative Problem Orientation scales of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI-R) by examining the relations between these scales and measures of optimism, pessimism, and trait affectivity. Consistent with expectations based on social problem-solving theory, positive problem orientation was found to have a relatively large amount of variance in common with optimism and positive affectivity, and negative problem orientation was found to share a large amount of variance with pessimism and negative affectivity, but not enough to be considered redundant in either case. Positive problem orientation was found to add significant incremental validity to the prediction of adaptive problem-engagement coping even after partialing out the variance associated with optimism and positive affectivity. In addition, negative problem orientation was found to add unique variance to the prediction of psychological distress even after controlling for pessimism and negative affectivity.

Explore related subjects

Adaptation, Psychological Adolescent Adult Affect Female Humans Male Problem Solving Reproducibility of Results Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

E C Chang, T J D'Zurilla. 1996. Relations between problem orientation and optimism, pessimism, and trait affectivity: a construct validation study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00046-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Appraisal and coping strategies in stressful situations: a comparison of individuals who binge eat and controls.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether individuals who engage in binge eating appraise and cope with stressful situations in a different manner than people who do not regularly binge eat. METHOD: Female undergraduates participated in a two-part study. The laboratory portion of the study involved participation in two tasks: an interpersonal stressor and an academic stressor. In the second portion of the study, participants completed a daily stress inventory for 1 week. RESULTS: Individuals in the binge group appraised both the laboratory and natural environment stressors as more stressful than did the controls. Differences were evident in the amount and type of coping strategies used between eating groups. The binge group reported using more positive coping strategies and more catastrophizing in both settings. DISCUSSION: Together, the results suggest that appraisal and coping or stress management components may be useful in treatment packages for individuals who binge eat.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1997

Anticipating retirement: the formation of narratives concerning an occupational transition.

OBJECTIVE: This study is the first part of a longitudinal investigation of the retirement process. This stage of the inquiry concerned how older persons anticipate their retirement. METHOD: Thirty-two workers were randomly selected from all workers age 63 years in a suburb of Stockholm. They participated in semistructured interviews about their work and their expectations for retirement. RESULTS: The participants narratives illustrated the complex work of interpreting the past and expected meaning in one's occupational life. The narratives, which anticipated widely different future trajectories, revealed many of the challenges and dilemmas of anticipating retirement and the close association of work experience to expectations for retirement. In particular, the narratives highlighted the participants' concerns about maintaining the quality of experience in activity. The findings also demonstrate the process by which persons anticipate and make choices about life change. CONCLUSIONS: People anticipate retirement through volitional narratives in which they link together past, present, and future. Understanding this volitional process of interpreting, anticipating, and making choices is important to understanding how people adapt to life changes.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1997

Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits of matching alcohol dependent clients to three different treatments with reference to a variety of client attributes. METHODS: Two parallel but independent randomized clinical trials were conducted, one with alcohol dependent clients receiving outpatient therapy (N = 952; 72% male) and one with clients receiving aftercare therapy following inpatient or day hospital treatment (N = 774; 80% male). Clients were randomly assigned to one of three 12-week, manual-guided, individually delivered treatments: Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy, Motivational Enhancement Therapy or Twelve-Step Facilitation Therapy. Clients were then monitored over a 1-year posttreatment period. Individual differences in response to treatment were modeled as a latent growth process and evaluated for 10 primary matching variables and 16 contrasts specified a priori. The primary outcome measures were percent days abstinent and drinks per drinking day during the 1-year posttreatment period. RESULTS: Clients attended on average two-thirds of treatment sessions offered, indicating that substantial amounts of treatment were delivered, and research follow-up rates exceeded 90% of living subjects interviewed at the 1-year posttreatment assessment. Significant and sustained improvements in drinking outcomes were achieved from baseline to 1-year posttreatment by the clients assigned to each of these well-defined and individually delivered psychosocial treatments. There was little difference in outcomes by type of treatment. Only one attribute, psychiatric severity, demonstrated a significant attribute by treatment interaction: In the outpatient study, clients low in psychiatric severity had more abstinent days after 12-step facilitation treatment than after cognitive behavioral therapy. Neither treatment was clearly superior for clients with higher levels of psychiatric severity. Two other attributes showed time-dependent matching effects: motivation among outpatients and meaning-seeking among aftercare clients. Client attributes of motivational readiness, network support for drinking, alcohol involvement, gender, psychiatric severity and sociopathy were prognostic of drinking outcomes over time. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that psychiatric severity should be considered when assigning clients to outpatient therapies. The lack of other robust matching effects suggests that, aside from psychiatric severity, providers need not take these client characteristics into account when triaging clients to one or the other of these three individually delivered treatment approaches, despite their different treatment philosophies.

Adaptation, Psychological↗