PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8743238

Chronic opioids for chronic low back pain--solution or problem?

Abstract

The article by Brown et al does not provide data to justify long-term opioid use but does suggest a treatment option for the many patients who have chronic back pain and who want the help that our medical delivery system often does not provide. Having worked in a tertiary referral pain clinic that serves many low back pain patients who have demonstrated the ineffectiveness of chronic opiate therapy, I am strongly ambivalent about recommending prescribing ongoing opioiod therapy for chronic pain patients. The caveats about prescribing opioids for such patients are most appropriate (i.e., do not prescribe opioids for those who have a history of problems with opioid therapy or for whom increased intake is associated with decreased function); however, for patients who do not display these problems (and there could be many out there), I am sympathetic with the sentiments expressed by Brown et al. A trial of these drugs might be warranted if all else fails and continued therapy with opioids seems justified, but only with zealous attention to monitoring function and therapeutic compliance, as outlined by the authors. With regard to the doses needed for control, the method of opioid administration might be important, that is, whether it is in tablets or in a masking vehicle. In this day of open dialogue, it is not fashionable to blind the patient to the drug or dose, but I believe blinding has a place in the care of a particular group of patients whose symptom (pain) can vary considerably with time. I have found that most chronic pain patients rarely, if ever, reduce their analgesic intake in better times, but an attentive physician can if masking vehicles are used. Thus the physician can limit the amount of drug consumed long term. In my personal experiences with comparable chronic nonmalignant pain patients (albeit in different hemispheres), the average opioid maintenance (methadone) dosage was halved by prescribing the drug in a masking vehicle rather than as a tablet. If pain complaints are reduced and if function is improved according to the record (eg, patient is working) and the relatives' report, and if you, the prescribing physician, are happy, then a long-term regimen of opioid therapy is probably fine. Further controlled trials are needed to see whether this therapy works, and if so, what are the optimal agent(s) and dosages, what is optimal monitoring, and most important of all, who is the optimal patient who might derive not only analgesia but also functional benefit rather than compromise from this therapy. If we cannot make patients better, we must not make them worse.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T M Murphy. Chronic opioids for chronic low back pain--solution or problem?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8743238/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sex differences in the potency of kappa opioids and mixed-action opioids administered systemically and at the site of inflammation against capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia in rats.

RATIONALE: Sex differences in the potency of the antinociceptive effects of kappa opioids have been reported in various acute pain models with evidence suggesting that these sex differences are mediated by activity in the N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) system. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate sex differences in the antihyperalgesic actions of selected kappa and mixed-action opioids in a persistent pain model and determine if the NMDA system modulates these effects in a sexually dimorphic manner. METHODS: Using gonadally intact male and female F344 rats, hyperalgesia was induced by local administration of capsaicin in the tail, after which the tail was immersed in a mildly noxious thermal stimulus (45 degrees C water), and tail-withdrawal latency measured. Opioids were then administered systemically (s.c.) and locally (in the tail) alone, and in selected combinations with the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist dextromethorphan. RESULTS: When administered systemically and locally, the kappa opioids spiradoline, U69,593 and U50,488, and the mixed-action opioids butorphanol and nalbuphine, produced dose-dependent antihyperalgesic effects. Whereas the kappa opioids were generally more potent in males, sex differences were not observed with the mixed-action opioids. Peripheral receptor activity was confirmed for local administration of kappa opioids by the antagonism observed after local, but not intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.), administration of the kappa antagonist nor-binaltorphamine (nor-BNI). Dextromethorphan was equally potent in attenuating the antihyperalgesia induced by kappa opioids in both males and females. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate sex differences in kappa opioid activity in a persistent pain model. Although an NMDA antagonist blocked the effects of kappa opioids in this model, these effects were not sexually dimorphic as reported in most acute pain models.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Systematic review: opioid treatment for chronic back pain: prevalence, efficacy, and association with addiction.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence, efficacy, and risk for addiction for persons receiving opioids for chronic back pain are unclear. PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of opioid treatment, whether opioid medications are effective, and the prevalence of substance use disorders among patients receiving opioid medications for chronic back pain. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies from MEDLINE (1966-March 2005), EMBASE (1966-March 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (to 4th quarter 2004), PsychInfo (1966-March 2005), and retrieved references. STUDY SELECTION: Articles that studied an adult, nonobstetric sample; used oral, topical, or transdermal opioids; and focused on treatment for chronic back pain. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently extracted data and determined study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Opioid prescribing varied by treatment setting (range, 3% to 66%). Meta-analysis of the 4 studies assessing the efficacy of opioids compared with placebo or a nonopioid control did not show reduced pain with opioids (g, -0.199 composite standardized mean difference [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.11]; P = 0.136). Meta-analysis of the 5 studies directly comparing the efficacy of different opioids demonstrated a nonsignificant reduction in pain from baseline (g, -0.93 composite standardized mean difference [CI, -1.89 to -0.03]; P = 0.055). The prevalence of lifetime substance use disorders ranged from 36% to 56%, and the estimates of the prevalence of current substance use disorders were as high as 43%. Aberrant medication-taking behaviors ranged from 5% to 24%. LIMITATIONS: Retrieval and publication biases and poor study quality. No trial evaluating the efficacy of opioids was longer than 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids are commonly prescribed for chronic back pain and may be efficacious for short-term pain relief. Long-term efficacy (> or =16 weeks) is unclear. Substance use disorders are common in patients taking opioids for back pain, and aberrant medication-taking behaviors occur in up to 24% of cases.

Analgesics, Opioid↗