PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8759467

Visual motion processing in one-month-old infants: preferential looking experiments.

J Wattam-Bell
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The ability of infants to discriminate between opposite directions of motion was assessed using forced-choice preferential looking between a random-dot pattern which was segregated into regions which moved in opposite directions, and a uniform pattern in which all the dots moved in the same direction. The first experiment measured velocity thresholds (Vmin and Vmax) for direction discrimination; between 10 and 13 weeks Vmin decreased, while at the same time Vmax increased. The second experiment explored possible implications of this expanding velocity range for direction discrimination by younger infants. One-month-olds showed no evidence for direction discrimination at any of a number of test velocities in the range 1-43 deg/sec. The 1-month-olds were also tested with two additional conditions: they could discriminate between moving and static patterns at velocities of 10 deg/sec or above, and they could also discriminate between coherent and incoherent motion at velocities of 21 deg/sec or below. Neither of these discriminations depends on sensitivity to the direction of the coherent motion. The results suggest that 1-month-olds may not be sensitive to the direction of visual motion.

Explore related subjects

CuesDiscrimination, PsychologicalFixation, OcularHumansInfantInfant BehaviorInfant, NewbornMotion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualTime FactorsJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Wattam-Bell. 1996. Visual motion processing in one-month-old infants: preferential looking experiments.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00236-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance.

We investigated the changes of human posture control of upright stance which occur when vestibular cues (VEST) are absent and visual and somatosensory orientation cues (VIS, SOM) are removed. Postural responses to sinusoidal tilts of a motion platform in the sagittal plane (+/-2 degrees, f=0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 Hz) were studied in normal subjects (Ns) and patients with bilateral vestibular loss (Ps). We found that absence of VEST (Ps, visual reference) and removal of VIS (Ns, no visual reference) had little effect on stabilization of upright body posture in space. In the absence of both VEST and VIS (Ps, no visual reference) somatosensory graviception still provided some information on body orientation in space at 0.05 and 0.1 Hz. However, at the higher frequencies Ps qualitatively changed their behavior; they then tended to actively align their bodies with respect to the motion platform. The findings confirm predictions of a novel postural control model.

Cues↗
PubMed2000

A Fraser illusion without local cues?

In the well-known Fraser illusion, a line composed of tilted elements itself appears tilted. The standard explanation of this illusion has been that the global orientation of the line is in some way influenced by the local orientation of the elements. The illusion was recreated using a texture composed of collinear Gabor stimuli, which were vertical. There was no local tilt. The illusory tilt was produced by gradually shifting the phase of the successive Gabors along each line. Although the 2D Fourier transform of this global pattern peaks at off-vertical orientations, the local energy of the patches is predominantly vertical. How does the visual system nevertheless pick up this global information? This can be explained by elongated linear filters, or a phase-tuned second-stage mechanism. We examined the first theory using a stereoscopic demonstration. When lines of opposite tilt are presented in the two eyes, they combine binocularly to produce stereoscopic slant. We tested whether the illusory tilts in the phase-shifted Gabors texture give stereoscopic slant, when opposite tilts are presented to the two eyes. They do not. Instead, stereoscopic depth is dominated by the local phase-disparity of the individual patches. This indicates that the illusion is not present at the stage of linear filters, which are input to stereo, but must involve second-stage interactions or collators.

Cues↗
PubMed2000

Visual motion priming by invisible actions.

Element shape biases the perceived direction in ambiguous apparent motion displays. Likewise, the direction of motion influences the perception of ambiguous elements' shapes. A recent framework that suggests common spatial representations for perception and action predicts that actions should also influence the perceived direction of motion in ambiguous displays. In four experiments the perceived direction of an ambiguous display was shown to be primed by different types of invisible actions. An investigation of several aspects of action processing (like the type and direction of the hand movement or direction of the cue for the hand movement) showed that priming only occurred if the goal of the action and the motion display shared a common cognitive dimension. When that common dimension is given, planning an action is sufficient for motion priming.

Cues↗