PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8768507

Activity measurements support dimensional assessment.

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual approach to motor excess has been to treat it as a categorical variable whose presence functions as an inclusion criterion. Motor excess is thought to occur primarily during structured settings that maximize attentional demands. Activity is rarely measured as a dimensional attribute despite availability of a wide variety of suitable instruments for more than a decade (Tryon, 1985). The present study measured activity using electronic step counters in structured and unstructured school settings, commuting from home to school and back home, and at home for 2 consecutive weeks in 60 children selected from 450 children using Factor IV (hyperactivity) scores from the Conners Teacher Rating Scale to represent three levels of hyperactivity. Results indicate that (a) children rated as hyperactive are measurably more active than children rated as normally active in unstructured as well as structured situations, (b) measured activity correlates consistently and substantially with rated activity in unstructured and structured situations, and (c) a single activity factor characterizes measured activity in all situations except for class transitions during school. These results and other published findings support a quantitative (dimensional) rather than qualitative (categorical) approach to motor excess.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L P Pinto, W W Tryon. 1996. Activity measurements support dimensional assessment.. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455960203001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗