PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8776242

The second-trimester fetus with Down syndrome: detection using sonographic features.

Abstract

Down syndrome (trisomy 21) is the most common chromosomal abnormality among liveborn infants in the United States, with an incidence of 1/700 to 1/1000 births. Its incidence rises with maternal age, thus prompting the current practice of offering genetic amniocentesis to women 35 years of age or older. However, even if every pregnant woman of advanced maternal age (> or = 35 years) were to undergo karyotyping, only 20% of fetuses with Down syndrome would be detected. Until approximately 10 years ago, karyotyping of the fetuses of older women was practically the only antenatal method of identifying any fetus with trisomy 21. In 1984, Cuckle and associates first reported the use of a low level of serum alpha-fetoprotein as a screening tool for identifying affected fetuses in younger women. Combining the criteria based on both maternal age and serum alpha-fetoprotein resulted in identifying 40% of fetuses with Down syndrome, as well as 6.8% of unaffected fetuses. Still, at least 60% of fetuses with Down syndrome remained undetected with these screening techniques. It is logical to expect that sonographic imaging of the second-trimester fetus itself would result in the optimal detection of the anatomical features of Down syndrome (Figure 1). To this end, many researchers have attempted to identify sonographic findings that would serve to detect fetuses likely to have Down syndrome. This review summarizes the characteristic sonographic findings associated with an increased risk of a fetus having trisomy 21.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B R Benacerraf. 1996. The second-trimester fetus with Down syndrome: detection using sonographic features.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07020147.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in nonerosive reflux disease.

This review evaluates the current knowledge about the recognition of histologic esophageal mucosal changes in patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and analyzes the technical factors relevant to their interpretation. Studies investigating histologic changes in individuals with nonerosive reflux disease were identified by systematic Medline/PubMed searches from January 1966 to October 2005. Dilation of intercellular spaces was the most consistently reported histologic change in the esophageal mucosa of patients with nonerosive reflux disease, being observed in 41%-100% of patients and 0%-30% of controls. The mean intercellular space width was at least 2 times greater in patients than in controls, irrespective of esophageal acid exposure. Basal cell hyperplasia was observed in 9%-90% of patients compared with 10%-55% of controls. Papillary elongation was observed in 0%-85% of patients and 5%-20% of controls. Both of these features were more prevalent in reflux disease patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure. All histologic changes responded to acid-suppressive therapy. Inflammatory cell infiltration was seldom observed or had a similar prevalence in patients and controls. Disparities in reported frequencies of change among studies were most likely caused by methodologic factors, most importantly the use of different methods for identifying patients and controls, for histologic sampling, and for biopsy scoring. The reviewed studies suggest that at least two thirds of patients with nonerosive reflux disease have histologic evidence of esophageal injury. Additional work is needed to assess the potential of these histologic changes for the diagnosis and assessment of reflux disease.

Dilatation, Pathologic↗

Influence of the initial rectal distension on posterior margins in primary and postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to define the effect of different rectum fillings in the planning CT study on the posterior clinical target volume (CTV) displacements (PD) in primary and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent CT scans in supine position with a full bladder and an empty bladder before RT and at several points in time during the treatment. PD were determined depending on the initial rectum volume (RV), average cross-sectional rectal area (CSA), and the rectal diameter at the level of the bladder neck (RD). RESULTS: Posterior CTV motion was not found to be minimal with a particularly small initial rectum filling. Steeply increasing PD resulted for patients with RV>120cm(3), CSA>12cm(2), and RD>4.5cm. While below these critical values a posterior margin of 6mm/9mm allowed to cover 80%/90% of displacements, 18mm/24mm were needed for patients with larger rectum fillings. No correlation of increasing rectum distension with increasing PD was found at the apex level. PD could not be reduced by voiding the bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Defining the posterior margin in prostate RT, the initial rectum distension and the superior-inferior CTV level has to be considered. Patients with large initial rectum fillings have preferentially the need for repeated planning CT scans or image-guided RT.

Dilatation, Pathologic↗