PubMed · 8815534
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E B Hook. 1996-09-27. Morality play.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8815534/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In this study, we report the coding-complete genome sequence of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 13 (GLRaV-13), isolate CA8881, detected in Vitis vinifera in California, USA. The genome sequence exhibited over 95% nucleotide identity with previously reported GLRaV-13 isolates and contributed to better understanding of the genetic diversity of ampeloviruses infecting grapevine.
CONTEXT: In 1995, California adopted a bill that brought laboratory laws in line with the 1988 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments' standards for clinical laboratories and mandated a study comparing results in physicians' office laboratories (POLs) with other settings. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether persons conducting tests in POLs produce accurate and reliable test results comparable to those produced by non-POLs. DESIGN: Survey of clinical laboratories using proficiency testing data. SETTING: All California clinical laboratories participating in the American Association of Bioanalysts proficiency testing program in 1996 (n=1110). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: "Unsatisfactory" (single testing event failure) and "unsuccessful" (repeated testing event failure) on proficiency testing samples. RESULTS: The unsatisfactory failure rate for POLs was nearly 3 times (21.5% vs 8.1%) the rate for the non-POLs and about 1.5 times (21.5% vs 14.0%) for POLs that used laboratory professionals as testing or supervisory personnel (P<.001). The POL unsuccessful rate was more than 4 times (4.4% vs 0.9%) the rate for non-POLs and more than twice (4.4% vs 1.8%) the rate for the POLs using laboratory professionals (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist among POLs, POLs using licensed clinical laboratory scientists (medical technologists), and non-POLs. Testing personnel in many POLs might lack the necessary education, training, and oversight common to larger facilities. We must better understand the contributing factors that result in the poorer results of POLs relative to non-POLs. In the meantime, patients should be aware that preliminary findings suggest that differences in quality of laboratory tests based on testing site may exist. Laboratory directors at all testing sites must ensure that they understand laboratory practice sufficiently to minimize errors and maximize accuracy and reliability. Directors must understand their obligation when they elect to oversee those assigned testing responsibility. Legislators may wish to reconsider the wisdom of further easing restrictions on those to whom we entrust our laboratory specimens.
Despite widespread belief that public support is critical to the success of public health programs and agencies, systematic efforts to measure public opinion about public health have been limited. This report summarizes surveys conducted by two organizations-one a public policy center in California, the other a national opinion polling firm-to measure support for public health activities. The findings indicate widespread support for community-oriented disease-prevention and health-promotion activities.