PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8838282

Catching up.

Abstract

The medical school I (S.M.) attended did not require dissection of a cadaver to fulfill the requirements of the anatomy curriculum. I had "learned" human anatomy through lectures, text books, and an atlas, but did no dissection. Although it was difficult doing anatomy that way, I passed basic science exams with high marks and did well on the board exams (NBME). I graduated from medical school with distinction and thought I was well prepared for residency. To my surprise, dissection of the orbit and periorbital regions and cranial cavity were included in my ophthalmology residency and were to pose a challenge for me. I requested the aid of a medical school anatomist to help me face this challenge. Not only did I learn the art of dissection, I gained considerable knowledge in anatomy (much of it clinically relevant), acquired better skill with surgical instruments and enhanced my logical and critical thinking ability. This viewpoint is based upon a diary I kept during my dissection experience.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Mutyala, D R Cahill. 1996. Catching up.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2353(1996)9%3A1%3C53%3A%3Aaid-ca11%3E3.0.co%3B2-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Nickolay Ivanovich Pirogoff. Innovative scientist and clinician.

More than a century has passed since the publication of the major academic works of the great Russian surgeon Nickolay Ivanovich Pirogoff, yet some of the ideas and surgical problems that challenged him are still clinically important today. Pirogoff's creative activity embraced a number of areas in medicine and was not limited to any particular discipline. A sample listing of his works and achievements would demonstrate his rank as a scientist and a surgeon of great genius.

Anatomy