PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8839591

Does gastric tonometry work? Yes.

S D Brown·G Gutierrez
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Gastric tonometry is gaining acceptance rapidly as a noninvasive method of monitoring tissue dysoxia in a key organ system that previously could not be assessed easily. In addition to being noninvasive, gastric tonometry also identifies dysoxia in shock sooner than currently available monitors. This allows for more timely intervention with a subsequent improvement in prognosis in defined groups of patients. Tonometry data that suggest continued dysoxia despite intervention should signal clinicians to seek alternative diagnoses or to question the efficacy of current therapies, including antibiotics.

Explore related subjects

Blood Gas Monitoring, TranscutaneousCell HypoxiaCritical CareHumansIntestinal MucosaManometryMonitoring, PhysiologicPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsShockJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S D Brown, G Gutierrez. 1996. Does gastric tonometry work? Yes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70263-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

[Measurement of local oxygen parameters for detection of cerebral ischemia. The significance of cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy and transconjunctival oxygen partial pressure in carotid surgery].

UNLABELLED: The principle of, "selective shunting" during carotid endarterectomy requires a special concept to monitor neuronal function. The valence of the oxymetric methods, "near-infrared" spectroscopy (NIRS) and conjunctival oxygen tension (pcjO2) was determined with the reference method somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP). METHODS: In 41 patients undergoing reconstructive surgery on the internal carotid artery, recordings of the different methods were obtained under control, during carotid occlusion and during reperfusion. Cerebral ischemia was assumed if a complete loss of SEP appeared and an intraluminal shunt was placed. Conjunctival oxygen tension was measured continuously and simultaneously on the ipsi- and contralateral eye. RESULTS: In comparison to the reference method (SEP) the sensitivity and specificity of NIRS was 80% and 94%, respectively. The occlusion induced reduction of NIRS appeared 6.5 +/- 3.2 min earlier than the corresponding loss of SEP. Biocular determination of conjunctival oxygen tension was not able to detect hypoperfusion dependent ischemia during carotid occlusion. CONCLUSION: During carotid endarterectomy the measurement of conjunctival oxygen tension is not useful to detect cerebral ischemia. The use of NIRS as a single neuronal monitor is not appropriate to perform, "selective shunting". In contrast to SEP, however, NIRS is characterized by its rapid changes immediately following carotid occlusion. This non invasive method is likely to complete the standard method SEP in a modified monitoring concept of neuronal function during carotid endarterectomy.

Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous↗
PubMed2000

A randomized, controlled trial of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during ERCP.

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry, used to monitor oxygen saturation during endoscopy, does not directly measure hypoventilation. Study goals were to determine whether transcutaneous carbon dioxide (PtcCO(2)) monitoring during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) prevents severe hypoventilation and to assess the accuracy of clinical observation and pulse oximetry in detecting hypoventilation. METHODS: All patients received intensive clinical and electronic monitoring including pulse oximetry. Supplemental oxygen was administered for pulse oximetry < 90%. Patients were randomized to a treatment arm (group 1) where PtcCO(2) monitoring guided sedation or a control arm (group 2) where PtcCO(2) was recorded but unavailable for guiding sedation. RESULTS: Group 1 had significantly fewer episodes of severe carbon dioxide retention (rise in PtcCO(2) >/=40 mm Hg above baseline) than group 2 (0 of 199 versus 5 of 196, respectively, p = 0.03), as well a shorter mean duration of procedure discomfort (8.3% of procedure duration rated as "uncomfortable" versus 11.5%, p = 0.04). Correlations between clinical observation and objective measures of ventilation were poor: level of sedation versus PtcCO(2) (R = 0.3) or pulse oximetry (R = 0.06); slowest respiratory rate versus PtcCO(2) (R = 0.4) or pulse oximetry (R = -0.4). PtcCO(2) rises of greater than 20 mm Hg occurred without oxygen desaturation in 10.7% of patients receiving supplemental oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Carbon dioxide retention during ERCP is not reliably detected by clinical observation or by pulse oximetry in patients receiving supplemental oxygen. The addition of PtcCO(2) monitoring prevents severe carbon dioxide retention more effectively than intensive clinical monitoring and pulse oximetry alone. The clinical relevancy of this observation needs to be determined in an appropriately designed outcome study.

Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous↗