PubMed · 8854681
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Miller. 1996. Interview with Julane Miller.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8854681/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To check the reliability and to analyse the validity of a questionnaire on organisational atmosphere (OA). DESIGN: Crossover and observational. SETTING: Primary care teams (PCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Two questionnaires were offered to all the doctors, nurses and social workers (548 professionals) from the 29 PCTs in an autonomous community. One questionnaire was on the OA and the other was a subjective assessment of satisfaction with the structure and functioning of their own team. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: When the results were analysed (initial factorial analysis), 3 items with only slight discrimination were eliminated from the OA questionnaire. Construction validity (factorial analysis with varimax method), reliability of the questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient) and of criterion (correlation between OA and variables in the subjective assessment questionnaire) were calculated. The overall response rate was 77.5% (402 professionals). Three dimensions which explained 57% of total variability and which confirmed adequate construction validity were identified: team-work, cohesion and commitment. "Team-work" comprised 9 items and explained 27.18% of total variability. "Cohesion" had 7 items, which explained 16.55% of variability. Lastly, "Commitment" explained 13.47% of variability, with 5 items. The validity of criterion was adequate (close correlation between OA and subjective assessment of structure and operation). Reliability was high (0.89 alpha and 0.92 Spearman-Brown for the entire questionnaire and > 0.7 for the dimensions). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the adapted questionnaire are sufficient and permit its routine primary care use in our health system to be recommended.
BACKGROUND: The rapidly evolving American health system creates economic and societal incentives for public and private health organizations to collaborate. Despite the apparent benefits of collaboration, there is a paucity of information available to help local agencies develop partnerships. This study, itself a collaboration between a school of public health (SPH) and a Georgia health district, was undertaken to identify critical factors necessary to successfully initiate and sustain a public/private community health collaboration. METHODS: Professional staff at the SPH conducted 26 standardized interviews involving participants from Cobb and Douglas counties Boards of Health; Promina Northwest (now known as Wellstar), a not-for-profit health system; and community stakeholders. Content analysis of each interview question was performed and comparisons were made both within each group and across groups. RESULTS: Trends were identified in the following key areas: vision of health care for Cobb and Douglas counties, forces driving collaboration, strengths of each organization, critical negotiating issues, and potential community gain resulting from the partnership. CONCLUSION: A shared vision between potential collaborators facilitates communication regarding strategies to achieve common goals. A previous history of working together in limited capacities allowed the partners to develop trust and respect for one another prior to entering negotiations. These factors, when taken in conjunction with each organization's strong leadership and knowledge of the community, build a strong foundation for a successful partnership.