PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8855005

Rod temporal channels.

Abstract

Mechanisms underlying rod temporal contrast sensitivity have been considered in terms of a fast retinal signal predominating at mesopic levels and a slower retinal signal predominating at scotopic levels. Here we use a small signal masking method, which has previously been used to delineate the cone-mediated cortical temporal channels, to investigate their rod-mediated cortical counterparts. The results suggest that there are three different rod-mediated cortical temporal channels, one which is lowpass and two which are bandpass. These mechanisms co-exist at all light levels and their relative sensitivity depend on the stimulus spatio-temporal frequency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R F Hess, S J Waugh, K Nordby. 1996. Rod temporal channels.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(96)89254-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Scotopic vision in colour-blinds.

Alleles causing colour-blindness are present in humans at non-negligible levels, and it is not yet understood how colour-blindness is maintained, since colour-vision probably provides a selective advantage, e.g. when foraging. We show that after dark-adaptation colour-blinds had lower light perception thresholds than colour-normals (0.44 log-units), which may give a selective advantage under scotopic conditions, which may offset the disadvantage that colour-blinds suffer during foraging.

Color Vision Defects

Macular pigment densities derived from central and peripheral spectral sensitivity differences.

Estimates of the density spectrum of the macular pigment (Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. Color Science: Concepts and Methods. Quantitative Data and Formulas. 1st ed. New York: Wiley, 1967); (Vos JJ. Literature review of human macular absorption in the visible and its consequences for the cone receptor primaries. Institute for Perception. Soesterberg, The Netherlands, 1972) are partially based on the difference between central and peripheral spectral sensitivities, measured under conditions chosen to isolate a single cone class (Stiles WS. Madrid: Union Internationale de Physique Pure et Appliquée, 1953;1:65-103). Such derivations assume that the isolated spectral sensitivity is the same at both retinal locations, save for the intervening macular pigment. If this is true, then the type of cone class mediating detection should not influence the calculated difference spectrum. To test this assumption, we measured central and peripheral spectral sensitivities in a deuteranope, a protanope and a normal trichromat observer: (a) for short-wave sensitive (S-) cone detection; and (b) for long-wave sensitive (L-) cone detection (deuteranope), for middle-wave sensitive (M-) cone detection (protanope) or for both L- and M-cone detection (normal trichromat). The difference spectra determined for L- or M-cone detection deviate significantly from those measured for S-cone detection, at wavelengths below 450 nm. A theoretical analysis suggests that the discrepancies are owing, in part, to regional variation in the optical density of the cone pigments; and that such receptor variation cannot be ignored when deriving the standard density spectrum of the macular pigment.

Color Vision Defects