PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8892994

How does morphine work?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L L Iversen. 1996-10-31. How does morphine work?. https://doi.org/10.1038/383759a0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Mu and delta opioid receptor analgesia, binding density, and mRNA levels in mice selectively bred for high and low analgesia.

The present study examined mu and delta opioid analgesia, receptor binding, and receptor mRNA levels in lines of mice from two selective breeding projects of relevance to opioid analgesia. Large differences were observed in the analgesic potency of [d-Ala2, NMPhe4, Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO), [d-Pen2,5]enkephalin (DPDPE), and [d-Ala2]deltorphin II (DELT), selective mu, delta1, and delta2 opioid receptor agonists, respectively, in mice selectively bred for high (HA) and low (LA) swim stress-induced analgesia (SIA). HAR and LAR mice, selectively bred for high and low levorphanol analgesia, respectively, display equally large differences in their analgesic sensitivity to DAMGO, modest differences in sensitivity to DPDPE, and no differences in sensitivity to DELT. These sizable genotypic differences in analgesic potency were accompanied by HA/LA and HAR/LAR differences in whole-brain homogenate [3H]DPDPE and/or [3H]DELT, but paradoxically not [3H]DAMGO, binding. Solution hybridization of mRNA extracts encoding mu (MOR-1) or delta (DOR-1) opioid receptors indicated some regional differences in gene expression between high and low lines. Surprisingly, differences in these in vitro markers were often in the direction of LAR>HAR. The present data indicate that selection for either SSIA or levorphanol analgesia produces differential effects on mu and delta opioid analgesia that are accompanied by alterations on in vitro assays, the significance of which remains to be determined. The data are discussed with regard to the utility of in vitro biological markers and genetic models of analgesia.

Analgesics, Opioid

Unresponsiveness to cannabinoids and reduced addictive effects of opiates in CB1 receptor knockout mice.

The function of the central cannabinoid receptor (CB1) was investigated by invalidating its gene. Mutant mice did not respond to cannabinoid drugs, demonstrating the exclusive role of the CB1 receptor in mediating analgesia, reinforcement, hypothermia, hypolocomotion, and hypotension. The acute effects of opiates were unaffected, but the reinforcing properties of morphine and the severity of the withdrawal syndrome were strongly reduced. These observations suggest that the CB1 receptor is involved in the motivational properties of opiates and in the development of physical dependence and extend the concept of an interconnected role of CB1 and opiate receptors in the brain areas mediating addictive behavior.

Analgesics, Opioid

Modulation of endomorphin-2-induced analgesia by dipeptidyl peptidase IV.

The tetrapeptide, endomorphin-2 (Tyr-Pro-Phe-PheNH2) possesses high affinity for mu opioid receptors, and produces potent analgesia in mice. Its structure appears to satisfy the substrate requirements of the proteinase, dipeptidyl peptidase IV which removes dipeptides from the amino terminus of peptides containing proline as the penultimate amino acid. A potent, stable and specific inhibitor of this enzyme, Ala-Pyrrolidonyl-2-nitrile, has been described which should potentiate endomorphin-2-induced analgesia. Further, since dipeptidyl peptidase IV has an absolute requirement for l-Pro, a more metabolically-stable d-Pro2-endomorphin-2 analog should produce longer analgesic actions at lower doses. The present study found that endomorphin-2 was degraded approximately twice as fast than the chromogenic substrate, Ala-Pro-2naphthylamide, by dipeptidyl peptidase IV, whereas d-Pro2-endomorphin-2 was totally resistant to this enzyme's action. d-Pro2-endomorphin-2 (ED50=0.05 microg) was more potent than endomorphin-2 (ED50=30 microg) in significantly increasing tail-flick latencies with longer durations of action. Both the peptide and analogue were equipotent (ED50=0.5 microg) in significantly increasing jump thresholds. Ala-Pyrrolidonyl-2-nitrile (10-75 nmol) elicited a dose-dependent analgesia, and potentiated the analgesic actions of endomorphin-2, particularly on the tail-flick test. Whereas systemic naltrexone (2.5, 10 mg/kg) dose-dependently eliminated each of the three forms of analgesia on the jump test as well as the peak (15 min) effect on the tail-flick test, analgesia elicited by either endomorphin-2, d-Pro2-endomorphin-2 or Ala-Pyrrolidonyl-2-nitrile returned after 30-60 min in naltrexone-treated rats on the tail-flick test. These data strongly suggest that dipeptidyl peptidase IV plays a role in the inactivation of endomorphin-2 in vivo, and thereby modulates its central analgesic actions.

Analgesics, Opioid