PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8933612

The analyst's influence.

L Grossman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Analytic work involves a variety of influences the analyst brings to bear on the patient. Our emphasis on the centrality of interpretation tends to neglect consideration of the many ways in which the analyst influences the patient other than by the content of interpretation. The author considers the kinds of influence necessary to establish and maintain an analytic process and a therapeutic alliance. The nature and the role of the analyst's authority are discussed, along with the issue of how the analyst influences the patient to question the analyst's authority.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationCountertransferenceHumansProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychoanalysisPsychoanalytic InterpretationJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Grossman. 1996. The analyst's influence.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8933612/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

A multidisciplinary approach for improving services in primary care: randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of improving screening for carriers of haemoglobin disorders in general practice by using a nurse facilitator to work with primary care teams and the relevant haematology laboratories; to identify problems in communication between all those involved in delivering the service, and to implement solutions. DESIGN: Two year, practice based randomised controlled trial. SETTING: North London area where 29% of residents and 43% of births are in ethnic groups at risk for haemoglobin disorders. SUBJECTS: 26 of the 93 practices using the services of the area's haematology laboratory agreed to take part and were randomly divided into control and intervention practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in number of requests for screening tests for haemoglobin disorders made by control and intervention practices in baseline and intervention years. RESULTS: The number of screening tests requested varied from 0-150 in the 93 practices in the baseline year. Study practices tended to have made a moderate number of requests (10-50) during this period. During the intervention year intervention practices made 292 more requests (99% increase) and control practices made 74 fewer requests (23% decrease; P=0.001 for difference in median change). Four practices, three of which were singlehanded, accounted for 75% of the increase. The number of requests from intervention practices, adjusted for baseline requests, was 3.2 times higher than control practices (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: General practitioners and practice nurses are willing to undertake a new genetic screening service (or expand an existing one) if they are persuaded that it benefits the health of a significant proportion of their practice population. They need appropriate tools (for example, information materials for carriers and groups at risk), and the laboratory must be sensitive to their needs. Preconceptional carrier screening and counselling need to be coupled with antenatal screening.

Communication↗
PubMed1998

Electronic patient-physician communication: problems and promise.

A critical mass of Internet users will soon enable wide diffusion of electronic communication within medical practice. E-mail between physicians and patients offers important opportunities for better communication. Linking patients and physicians through e-mail may increase the involvement of patients in supervising and documenting their own health care, processes that may activate patients and contribute to improved health. These new linkages may have profound implications for the patient-physician relationship. Although the federal government proposes regulation of telemedicine technologies and medical software, communications technologies are evolving under less scrutiny. Unless these technologies are implemented with substantial forethought, they may disturb delicate balances in the patient-physician relationship, widen social disparities in health outcomes, and create barriers to access to health care. This paper seeks to identify the promise and pitfalls of electronic patient-physician communication before such technology becomes widely distributed. A research agenda is proposed that would provide data that are useful for careful shaping of the communications infrastructure. The paper addresses the need to 1) define appropriate use of the various modes of patient-physician communication, 2) ensure the security and confidentiality of patient information, 3) create user interfaces that guide patients in effective use of the technology, 4) proactively assess medicolegal liability, and 5) ensure access to the technology by a multicultural, multilingual population with varying degrees of literacy.

Communication↗