PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 8962448

Regression analysis with missing covariate data using estimating equations.

Abstract

In regression analysis, missing covariate data has been among the most common problems. Frequently, practitioners adopt the so-called complete-case analysis, i.e., performing the analysis on only a complete dataset after excluding records with missing covariates. Performing a complete-case analysis is convenient with existing statistical packages, but it may be inefficient since the observed outcomes and covariates on those records with missing covariates are not used. It can even give misleading statistical inference if missing is not completely at random. This paper introduces a joint estimating equation (JEE) for regression analysis in the presence of missing observations on one covariate, which may be thought of as a method in a general framework for the missing covariate data problem proposed by Robins, Rotnitzky, and Zhao (1994, Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 846-866). A generalization of JEE to more than one such covariate is discussed. The JEE is generally applicable to estimating regression coefficients from a regression model, including linear and logistic regression. Provided that the missing covariate data is either missing completely at random or missing at random (in addition to mild regularity conditions), estimates of regression coefficients from the JEE are consistent and have an asymptotic normal distribution. Simulation results show that the asymptotic distribution of estimated coefficients performs well in finite samples. Also shown through the simulation study is that the validity of JEE estimates depends on the correct specification of the probability function that characterizes the missing mechanism, suggesting a need for further research on how to robustify the estimation from making this nuisance assumption. Finally, the JEE is illustrated with an application from a case-control study of diet and thyroid cancer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L P Zhao, S Lipsitz, D Lew. 1996. Regression analysis with missing covariate data using estimating equations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8962448/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

Standard survival data measure the time span from some time origin until the occurrence of one type of event. If several types of events occur, a model describing progression to each of these competing risks is needed. Multi-state models generalize competing risks models by also describing transitions to intermediate events. Methods to analyze such models have been developed over the last two decades. Fortunately, most of the analyzes can be performed within the standard statistical packages, but may require some extra effort with respect to data preparation and programming. This tutorial aims to review statistical methods for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models. Although some conceptual issues are covered, the emphasis is on practical issues like data preparation, estimation of the effect of covariates, and estimation of cumulative incidence functions and state and transition probabilities. Examples of analysis with standard software are shown.

Biometry↗

The role of education in biostatistical consulting.

Medical students, residents, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty commonly consult with biostatistical experts about study design and data analysis when conducting clinical research. The role of biostatistical training during these consultations is examined, and characterizations of the connections between biostatistical consultation and education are reviewed. The presence and kinds of teaching efforts during biostatistical consults at four academic research institutions over various periods of time between 1999 and 2005 (237 consultations in total) were recorded and are described. By site, 67, 70, 78, and 100 per cent of the consulting sessions included biostatistical training, with an overall 78 per cent (95 per cent CI: 73-83 per cent) of consultations including an educational component when all consultations were combined. Training covered a wide range of biostatistical topics. Seventy-five per cent of the consultations with faculty (120/161), 79 per cent with fellows and residents (31/39), and 100 per cent with medical students (10/10) included some degree of instruction in study design or statistical analysis topics. Results show that both the need and the opportunity exist for specialized biostatistical instruction during one-on-one sessions between a consulting biostatistician and physicians, medical students, and research staff. Academic researchers are ideally positioned to absorb this kind of training when they initiate a request for assistance with their own research project.

Biometry↗

Improving the quality of patient care using reliability measures: a classification tree approach.

This paper considers the application and interpretation of new reliability measures for a classification tree-based medical risk assessment tool. Following the construction of a classification tree reliability measures may then be used to provide an estimate of the precision of the classification and the probability in each terminal node of the classification tree. Identification of unreliable nodes (those that have low precision) in this application may indicate patient groups requiring closer monitoring or scenarios in which further information about the patient is required, thereby providing medical practitioners with an avenue for more informed decision making.

Biometry↗