PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9005559

[Covering soft tissue defects].

Abstract

In the past, the main emphasis in the treatment of complex limb injuries was placed upon the reconstruction of bony defects. Recently, however, reconstructive soft-tissue procedures have gained the attention they deserve. The salvage of a severely injured extremity depends rather on the feasibility of reconstructive surgical tissue procedures than on restoration of the bony defect. Sufficient vascularity is an essential condition for fracture healing and the prevention of post-traumatic complications like osteomyelitis and pseudarthrosis. If primary closure of a soft-tissue defect is not possible, preliminary covering has to be obtained with artificial skin replacement (vacuum sealing) until definitive covering with muscle or musculocutaneous flaps can be achieved. With the microvascular restorative techniques available today even complex soft-tissue problems can be solved. Nevertheless, an appropriate infrastructure and a trained and skilled surgeon are essential.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Kinzl, G Suger, R Stober. 1996. [Covering soft tissue defects].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050047

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pictorial review: imaging of peripheral nerve tumours.

The ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance features of extracranial nerve tumours are reviewed. Characteristic locations and appearances help to define nerve tumours although the imaging findings of nerve and other soft tissue tumours overlap.

Amputation Stumps

Primary motor cortex reorganization in a long-term monkey amputee.

The primary motor cortex (M1) was mapped with intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in a 15 year-old macaque whose right upper extremity was amputated at the shoulder joint prior to 2 years of age. Movements of the right shoulder girdle and stump were evoked by ICMS throughout the left M1 upper extremity region. The size of the left M1 upper extremity region contralateral to the amputated arm was not appreciably different from the size of the right upper extremity region contralateral to the intact arm. Long stimulus trains and/or higher stimulus currents were needed to evoke detectable movements at significantly more loci in the left than in the right M1 upper extremity region. These observations would be consistent with unmasking of a high threshold representation of shoulder musculature that normally exists throughout the central core of the upper extremity region, where it underlies a lower threshold representation of the distal forelimb. Alternatively, invasion of the de-efferented distal forelimb core by surrounding shoulder representation may have occurred. Differences between the limited M1 reorganization observed in the present study and the more extensive reorganization of S1 observed in other studies may reflect fundamental differences between M1 and S1, and/or differences in the extent of de-efferentation versus deafferentation.

Amputation Stumps