PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9041493

MR parameters for imaging titanium spinal instrumentation.

J C Wang·H S Sandhu·W D Yu·J T Minchew·R B Delamarter
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The presence of stainless steel implants along a spinal column causes extreme distortion of data collected by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The recent availability of titanium alloy spinal instrumentation systems suggests that MR imaging evaluation of the instrumented spine may now be feasible. The objective of this study was to perform MR imaging examinations on spines implanted with titanium alloy instrumentation and to determine the parameters that yield the highest quality images with the least amount of artifact. A titanium pedicle screw construct was implanted into the lumbar spine of two fresh human cadaveric specimens. Sequential spin echo MR scans were performed using various TE and TR ratios on each intact specimen. The resultant images were quantitatively graded for clarity of adjacent soft tissue and osseous structures. Excellent T1- and T2-weighted images with well-defined neural structures were obtained with minimal artifact. The optimal T1-weighted image was obtained with TE = 16 and TR = 500-600, whereas the optimal T2-weighted image was obtained with TE = 60 and TR = 1,300-1,600. By using appropriate settings, high-quality MR scans in both the T1- and T2-weighted modes can be obtained with minimal metal artifact.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOrthopedic Fixation DevicesRadiographySpineTitaniumJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Wang, H S Sandhu, W D Yu, J T Minchew, R B Delamarter. 1997. MR parameters for imaging titanium spinal instrumentation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9041493/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2008

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗