PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9103164

[Radiofrequency ablation in multiple accessory pathways].

Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation were performed in 465 consecutive patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. We demonstrated evidence of multiple accessory pathways in 18 patients (3.9%); 17 had two, and one had three accessory pathways. In three of these there was additional right atrio-fascicular connection. There were 27 manifest and 10 concealed accessory pathways. Six patients had Ebstein's anomaly associated with accessory pathways. The location of the accessory pathways was in the right posterior portion of the ventricular septum in 16, the left posterior portion of the ventricular septum in 5, the right free wall in 5, the left wall in 7, the right anteroseptal in 3, the midseptum in 1, and one right anterolateral. Of the 37 pathways, 32 (86%) accessory pathways were ablated successfully without complications. Duration of the procedure was 100 +/- 58 minutes, and fluoroscopic time 40 +/- 17 minutes. The mean applications were 26 +/- 17 and the power level of the radiofrequency current 41 +/- 6 W. A follow-up of 80 +/- 40 days after ablation demonstrated incidence of recurrent conduction in 3 accessory pathways (8%). In conclusion, patients with multiple accessory pathways can be treated by radiofrequency ablation in a single session with a high success rate although slightly less than that in patients with a single accessory pathway.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Iturralde Torres, S Lara, E Picos Bovio, L Colín Lizalde, S Kershenovich, J A González Hermosillo. [Radiofrequency ablation in multiple accessory pathways].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9103164/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The cost-effectiveness of preference-based treatment allocation: the case of hysterectomy versus endometrial resection in the treatment of menorrhagia.

Typically, economic evaluation compares the costs and benefits of two or more interventions and seeks to identify the single superior option on the basis of relative cost-effectiveness. It is then anticipated that all patients will receive the more or most cost-effective option. This 'all or nothing' approach can be departed from when sub-groups of patient exist, defined on the basis of clinical or demographic characteristics which are considered to influence benefit, for whom an option is cost-effective whilst not being so for the population of patients as a whole. However, patients' preferences concerning the different process characteristics and outcomes of an intervention will also influence the benefit they derive from health care. This paper explores the concept of preference-based sub-group analysis in economic evaluation to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of using patients' preferences to determine treatment allocation. The clinical example used to explore these methods is the comparison of abdominal hysterectomy (AH) and transcervical resection of the endometrial (TCRE) for the treatment of menorrhagia.

Catheter Ablation