PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9107124

Does swimming decrease the incidence of otitis media?

Abstract

To determine the influence of swimming on the incidence of otitis media in children, the authors designed a case control survey involving 32 children, aged 1 to 4 years, who were participating in swimming classes. Thirty control subjects were matched for age, race, and sex. The participants were pooled from the general pediatrics clinic and toddler swimming classes in Nassau County, New York. Parents completed a questionnaire gathering data over a 12-week study period during the winter months. Information was gathered regarding demographics, number of ear infections, history and frequency of swimming during the study period, presence of head submersion, day care center attendance, allergies, chronic medical conditions, otolaryngology consultations, ear surgery, and air travel. Forty-three percent of nonswimmers compared with 19% of swimmers had one or more ear infections during the study period (P < .02). The remaining factors surveyed did not differ significantly between groups. A review of the literature yielded two studies suggesting that swimming may have a beneficial effect on eustachian tube function and may indirectly decrease the occurrence of otitis media. Based on these findings, the authors conclude that there appears to be no basis to the commonly held belief that swimming may induce or exacerbate otitis media. In fact, the converse may be true.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L M Robertson, R V Marino, S Namjoshi. 1997. Does swimming decrease the incidence of otitis media?. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.1997.97.3.150

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and susceptibility of lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible association between the polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and the susceptibility of lung cancer so as to provide clues for genetic markers of lung cancer. METHODS: CYP1A1 rare genotypes MspI C and VV were detected with the methods of PCR-RFLP and ASA in a case-control study including 59 cases of lung cancer, 59 hospital controls and 73 healthy controls. RESULTS: The frequencies of rare genotypes C and VV of the lung cancer cases were not significantly different from those of the controls, though the frequency of C(25.4%) of the lung cancer cases was higher than that (16.5%) of the controls. However, in the non-smoking group with genotype(C),the risk of lung cancers was 2.43-2.91 times greater than that of the controls. Heterozygote B was overpresented in healthy controls (61.6%),compared to that of lung cancer cases(37.3%), P <0.01,odds ratio 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.17-0.80). CONCLUSION: Genotype C may be one of the susceptibly genetic markers of lung cancer in the non-smoking population. The risk of lung cancer can be decreased in persons with heterozygote.

Case-Control Studies

Risk of diphtheria among schoolchildren in the Russian Federation in relation to time since last vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Between 1990 and 1996, more than 110,000 cases and 2900 deaths from diphtheria were reported in the Russian Federation. In 1994, because disease rates were high among children aged 7-10 years, the age of administration of the second booster dose of diphtheria vaccine was lowered from 9 years to 6 years, the age of school entry. To assess the impact of this policy change, we did a matched case-control study in three Russian cities. METHODS: Children aged 6-8 years who had diphtheria between September, 1994, and December, 1996, were each matched with five to seven children acting as controls who were within 3 months of age of the case and were from the same class at school. We did a matched analysis using conditional logistic regression. FINDINGS: We analysed the immunisation records of 58 cases and 306 controls. All but one case and all controls had received at least three doses of diphtheria-toxoid vaccine. 19 (33%) cases and 144 (47%) controls had received a booster dose of diphtheria toxoid within the previous 2 years. Cases were more likely than were controls to have received only four doses rather than five (odds ratio 2.8 [95% CI 1.2-6.5]) and to have a time since the last dose of diphtheria toxoid of 3-4 years (3.1 [1.1-9.1]) or 5-7 years (15.0 [2.5-89.0]), compared with children for whom it was 2 years or less. On multivariate analysis only a time since the last dose of 5-7 years remained significantly associated with disease (matched odds ratio adjusted for total number of doses 10.9 [1.6-75.1]). CONCLUSION: A booster dose of diphtheria-toxoid vaccine given to children in the Russian Federation at 6-8 years of age reduced the interval since the last dose of diphtheria toxoid and improved protection against diphtheria.

Case-Control Studies

Effect of monochloramine disinfection of municipal drinking water on risk of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease.

BACKGROUND: Many Legionella infections are acquired through inhalation or aspiration of drinking water. Although about 25% of municipalities in the USA use monochloramine for disinfection of drinking water, the effect of monochloramine on the occurrence of Legionnaires' disease has never been studied. METHODS: We used a case-control study to compare disinfection methods for drinking water supplied to 32 hospitals that had had outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease with the disinfection method for water supplied to 48 control-hospitals, with control for selected hospital characteristics and water treatment factors. FINDINGS: Hospitals supplied with drinking water containing free chlorine as a residual disinfectant were more likely to have a reported outbreak of Legionnaires' disease than those that used water with monochloramine as a residual disinfectant (odds ratio 10.2 [95% CI 1.4-460]). This result suggests that 90% of outbreaks associated with drinking water might not have occurred if monochloramine had been used instead of free chlorine for residual disinfection (attributable proportion 0.90 [0.29-1.00]). INTERPRETATION: The protective effect of monochloramine against legionella should be confirmed by other studies. Chloramination of drinking water may be a cost-effective method for control of Legionnaires' disease at the municipal level or in individual hospitals, and widespread implementation could prevent thousands of cases.

Case-Control Studies