PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9124891

[Renal transplantectomy].

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Renal transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for most of the cases with end-stage renal failure. However, approximately 35% present failure of graft function within 5 years post-transplantation. The need for graft removal, which is infrequently discussed in the literature, and the surgical technique employed are discussed. METHODS: From September, 1976 to December, 1994, we have performed 877 renal transplants; of these, 145 (16.5%) required removal. The literature is reviewed, with special reference to the indications for graft removal and the different surgical techniques employed. RESULTS: Our data show that 42% of non-functioning renal transplants required removal at some time. No complications arising from conservative management were observed in the remaining 58%. Graft failure due to acute or early acute rejection invariably necessitated removal; thereafter transplant nephrectomy was uncommon. There were no deaths from failed grafts maintained in situ in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Like other authors, our approach is to leave the graft in situ with or without low doses of corticosteroids. Transplant nephrectomy is reserved for the symptomatic cases. For cases requiring nephrectomy less than three months post-transplantation, we utilize the extracapsular approach; thereafter we utilize the subcapsular technique.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Fernández Aparicio, B Miñana López, B Fraile Gómez, G Polo Villar, R Díaz González, O Leiva Galvis. 1996. [Renal transplantectomy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9124891/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach. RESULTS: Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

Bipolar pulse coagulation for resection of the cirrhotic liver.

BACKGROUND: The major technical challenge of liver surgery is controlling bleeding during transection of the parenchyma. The Gyrus hand piece (GHP) is a bipolar diathermy pulsation instrument that is similar in design to a large hemostat (Péan) clamp that divides tissue while the clamp remains closed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the peri-operative data from 10 patients with early cirrhosis (stage 1-4) who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular cancer between February 2004 and July 2005. Five consecutive patients who underwent resection using the GHP were compared to five other patients who underwent resection using the traditional "crush clamp technique" (CCT). Six patients underwent minor hepatectomy (<3 segments) and four underwent major hepatectomy (>3 segments). RESULTS: When the GHP was used, the mean Pringle time was 13 +/- 5 min, mean blood loss was 520 mL +/- 118, and mean operative time was 252 +/- 15 min. When the CCT was used, the average Pringle time was 13 +/- 3 min, mean blood loss was 630 +/- 67 mL, and mean operative time was 312 +/- 29 min. There were 2 major complications in the GHP group and 3 in the CCT group. Major complications included transient hepatic failure (i.e., ascites/encephalopathy) and biloma formation. CONCLUSIONS: One patient from each group suffered a minor wound complication. The average hospital stay was 8 days (range, 6-9) for the GHP group, and 8 days (range, 7-10) for CCT group. The operative mortality rate was 0%. Our preliminary results demonstrate that GHP provides an excellent and safe alternative to CCT for dividing the liver parenchyma in cirrhotic patients.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗